The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By Wykey
#452466
DaveBedford wrote:I just fail to see what he could write about.


Then I'd say that sums you up better than it would him.

If you don't have the mental capacity to imagine what he could write about, then you're something of an intellectual pygmy.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452469
Yudster wrote:I never knew Comedy Dave had a baby goat! Did he get it for his daughter?


Ooh, sensitive about the word kid...? ;)

DaveBedford wrote:
G-Sizzle wrote:Well this didn't take long.....
http://t.co/kzVjwoNg


LOL!


No text-speak please, thankyou.
User avatar
By Bas
#452473
Well, f**k it, i like Dave. If he comes across as a grumpy f**ker, then so what, i'm a grumpy f**ker. The point is i find him a very funny grumpy f**ker.
The show would be far worse for him not being there.
If i could be ever arsed to go on twitter, which i can't, then i'd be at his side, rooting for him against all the bed wetters , panty wasters & c**ts like Dave Bedford.
And if Lily f**ken Allen doesn't like him , then he goes even farther up in my estimation.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Last edited by Bas on Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By DaveBedford
#452479
Gosh, all that because I have a view different to most people on the forum.

You are all so liberal, I can tell. What forum rule did I break? I have just had a few people call me a c*** though, is personal abuse ok then.

Calm down!
User avatar
By Yudster
#452485
Nicola_Red wrote:
Yudster wrote:I never knew Comedy Dave had a baby goat! Did he get it for his daughter?
Ooh, sensitive about the word kid...? ;)


No more so than the incorrect use of any other word. I thought you were a pedant about such things too, or are there special circumstances here?
User avatar
By Wykey
#452487
DaveBedford wrote:Gosh, all that because I have a view different to most people on the forum.

You are all so liberal, I can tell. What forum rule did I break? I have just had a few people call me a c*** though, is personal abuse ok then.

Calm down!


I think you're a bit of an attention whore, which is why you protest too much. So generally speaking I don't value your opinion and you're not worth bothering with.

You do seem to be suggesting that people aren't allowed to have a different point of view than you though.
User avatar
By Wykey
#452488
Bas wrote:Well, f**k it, i like Dave. If he comes across as a grumpy f**ker, then so what, i'm a grumpy f**ker. The point is i find him a very funny grumpy f**ker.
The show would be far worse for him not being there.
If i could be ever arsed to go on twitter, which i can't, then i'd be at his side, rooting for him against all the bed wetters , panty wasters & c**ts like Dave Bedford.
And if Lily f**ken Allen doesn't like him , then he goes even farther up in my estimation.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.


I'll buy that for a dollar!
User avatar
By G-Sizzle
#452489
Yudster wrote:Hmmm - even if it IS a Divorce Number Two Fund project, I'm not sure its cynical exactly. People tell me its a decent enough read too (unlike Moyles' second book which was terrible). I wouldn't be surprised if someone got it for me for Christmas so I expect I will find out for myself at some point.



I thought it was only me who thought Moyles' second book was utter pants.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#452491
DaveBedford wrote:You are all so liberal, I can tell.

You say that like it's a bad thing.
User avatar
By neilt0
#452496
G-Sizzle wrote:
Yudster wrote:Hmmm - even if it IS a Divorce Number Two Fund project, I'm not sure its cynical exactly. People tell me its a decent enough read too (unlike Moyles' second book which was terrible). I wouldn't be surprised if someone got it for me for Christmas so I expect I will find out for myself at some point.



I thought it was only me who thought Moyles' second book was utter pants.


It was very weak. The first book was decent, but I think Chris admitted he really had to pad out the second one.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452498
Yudster wrote:
Nicola_Red wrote:
Yudster wrote:I never knew Comedy Dave had a baby goat! Did he get it for his daughter?
Ooh, sensitive about the word kid...? ;)


No more so than the incorrect use of any other word. I thought you were a pedant about such things too, or are there special circumstances here?


From dictionary.com:

kid
noun
1. Informal . a child or young person.


I totally am a pedant about language, but I couldn't possibly deny that I use informal expressions - I use them all the time. I don't regard that as being the same as 'incorrect'.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452501
DaveBedford wrote:You are all so liberal, I can tell. What forum rule did I break? I have just had a few people call me a c*** though, is personal abuse ok then.

Calm down!


The only rule you broke was with the LOL-ing - nothing else. Nobody is banning anybody. You might find that people would be less hostile though, and more calm, if you didn't liberally pepper your every post with your contempt for Dave. If you don't see why coming to a Chris Moyles Show fansite and doing nothing but criticise one of the key players of the show is winding people up...well, there's nothing more any of us can say.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452512
DevilsDuck wrote:I agree...but Dave isn't key to the show


You really think so? Do you realise how much stuff he writes?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452515
CPC, and basically all the set-piece features.
User avatar
By Yudster
#452521
Nicola_Red wrote:I totally am a pedant about language, but I couldn't possibly deny that I use informal expressions - I use them all the time. I don't regard that as being the same as 'incorrect'.


Neither do I really. I would have taken this a lot further if I hadn't been entirely sure that you would have no difficulty at all in digging out numerous quotes from here of me using the word kids to describe my children and others!
User avatar
By chrysostom
#452527
DaveBedford wrote:I have just had a few people call me a c*** though, is personal abuse ok then.


based on your contributions on the forum, you seem like a horrible person because you seem intent on devoting part of your spare time to coming onto a fan forum and abusing a co-presenter who you've never met, and is generally not controversial. the general demeanour that you portray is one of a bitter, twisted individual who absolutely wants to upset everyone else on the forum in order to gain attention to your posts, and a potential mention on the show. it's pretty sad, and reeks of someone who has anti-social tendencies and is ignored in their day-to-day life.

that's my opinion, in perfectly acceptable language - if you take um bridge with it then show me where i've erred.

better or worse than the c word?
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 9

Sat and today are up

Changes at Radio One

Scott Mills is finally getting a Breakfast Show, a[…]