Yudster wrote: ... The idea that we have to change our habits in order to be able to accommodate our entertainment is bonkers. Entertainment needs to slot in with people, not the other way around.
I know I've selectively quoted you here but I find this comment a bit "bonkers" to use your phrase
. I think, in general, we all make allowances to seek out entertainment that appeals to us, I know I do. In the context of radio though I am getting the impression, based on Moyles' rajars, that there is a large % of listeners that just have a radio tuned to their usual station and as long as its "good enough" and they will just accept it for the period they listen to it, maybe more as background noise. There will of course be listeners who engage with the content, seeking it out, and those who are put off by it and make and effort to retune to something else. This is what i think happens with R1 and R2. I'd therefore be interested to know if there are any calculations that can me made based on the ratings that moyles has currently, and other DAB national stations, to extrapolate them to being on national FM.
One other thing R1 and R2 has is the backing of the BBC and how it opens certain doors and enables a show to feel current. So things like access to Wimbledon, F1, Olympics, comic/sport relief which all fit in with what is happening at the time and also integrating into these being promoted across the rest of the BBC. Would Moyles being on radio x get to run with an Olympic torch if they were held in london this year, not a hope in hell. Also its clear that any celebrity promotions happening then the BBC shows will have the guests at around 8. Whereas Chris may get them after 9 and maybe off the back of some promotion they are doing for other Global shows. I'm sure Chris knows this and expected it to some degree after leaving the BBC and why Nick Grimshaw and Chris Evans should make hay whilst the sun shines. Evans even more so having had a recent taste of unpopularity outside of the comfort of his breakfast show.
One concerning thing for me is the comment that Chris made this morning regarding "This is the show, like it or leave it", paraphrasing there but that statement feels like it won't progress or evolve which every show needs to do. There appeared to be more effort on the old show around contract resigning time to freshen things again and trips down to the pub to think of new ideas. So maybe Chris being too comfortable is a bad thing as there is nothing really pushing him to innovate or have a wider appeal. I still think he needs regular features at regular times for a breakfast audience to anchor their morning around. Not necessarily the old features but new ones that allows Chris to bounce off and riff which is what he is good at.
So yes I agree the show isn't the same/as good as it used to be for some of the reasons above. Some aren't able to be changed, some are within Chris' control so its up to him. However its still good enough for me to put the extra effort in to seek it out, listen to at other times and to the podcast.
Wow that was quite serious. Anyway I'm a moron and I love horses, they are the best of all the animals.