The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By Travis Bickle
#452530
DevilsDuck wrote:Dave isn't key to the show


DevilsDuck wrote:Nope, what does he write apart from tedious


Do you listen to the show or is this forum somewhere you come just to pass the time and post stuff you know nothing about?
User avatar
By Travis Bickle
#452532
There is something wrong with this so called fansite when some nasty, vindictive troll comes on here (EDIT: Dave Bedford) and routinely slates an integral member of the show because of some ridiculous, illogical agenda yet only gets rebuked for typing 'lol'.

Is this a fansite or is it not? Fans post constructive views, good or bad. They dont wage unhinged vendettas against crucial members of a show they claim to be fans of.
Last edited by Travis Bickle on Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By DevilsDuck
#452534
I am not a troll, I just honestly think Dave has passed his best and wouldn't be missed that much if he left. He still has his moments where the old Dave shines through, but on the whole I think he has turned into an arrogant, grumpy, and not so comedy Dave. You on the other hand are a complete * moron!
User avatar
By Travis Bickle
#452536
DevilsDuck wrote:I am not a troll, I just honestly think Dave has passed his best and wouldn't be missed that much if he left. He still has his moments where the old Dave shines through, but on the whole I think he has turned into an arrogant, grumpy, and not so comedy Dave. You on the other hand are a complete * moron!


Dave Bedford was rebuked for using text speak. I was calling him a troll, not you.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452540
Travis Bickle wrote:There is something wrong with this so called fansite when some nasty, vindictive troll comes on here (EDIT: Dave Bedford) and routinely slates an integral member of the show because of some ridiculous, illogical agenda yet only gets rebuked for typing 'lol'.

Is this a fansite or is it not? Fans post constructive views, good or bad. They dont wage unhinged vendettas against crucial members of a show they claim to be fans of.


It is...but read the forum rules. There is no rule against criticising the show or the team.

Speaking just as a forum member rather than a moderator, I personally think that people's views shouldn't be censored, cos once you start that where do you stop it? I don't know where you would draw that line. I think Dave Bedford is wrong on every count, but I still feel he should have the right to say what he thinks.
By Emmy
#452542
simonpearce wrote:I was a massive of fan of Dave's until I started following him in Twitter where I guess his 'real' self comes out more. He's a bit of an arse tbh :(

Shame.


I follow him on Twitter, and can't think of anything much he's ever tweeted that's come across as arsey. Do you have any examples of things he's said?

I'm nailing my colours firmly to the mast of of the' I really like Dave' flag, and in fact if push came to shove I think I would name him as my favourite current member of the team (with Will being my ultimate favourite). I've never been keen on the girls on the show apart from Lizzie, Dom is lovely but just doesn't register as a favourite with me for some reason, Chris irritates me a lot sometimes, and I've really gone off Aled over the years as his ego and fake stupidity have got more and more out of control.

But Dave has always been way up there in my affections over all the years I've been listening, and contrary to what a lot of people on here have said recently, I honestly haven't noticed him changing and becoming less funny, more miserable etc. lately at all. I'm really puzzled as to where those opinions could have come from, so if anyone could enlighten me a bit then that would be great!
User avatar
By Travis Bickle
#452543
Nicola_Red wrote:
Travis Bickle wrote:There is something wrong with this so called fansite when some nasty, vindictive troll comes on here (EDIT: Dave Bedford) and routinely slates an integral member of the show because of some ridiculous, illogical agenda yet only gets rebuked for typing 'lol'.

Is this a fansite or is it not? Fans post constructive views, good or bad. They dont wage unhinged vendettas against crucial members of a show they claim to be fans of.


It is...but read the forum rules. There is no rule against criticising the show or the team.

Speaking just as a forum member rather than a moderator, I personally think that people's views shouldn't be censored, cos once you start that where do you stop it? I don't know where you would draw that line. I think Dave Bedford is wrong on every count, but I still feel he should have the right to say what he thinks.


And it was the rules I was criticising. I have done more than my fair share of criticising the show and the team, but I like to think I am constructive and that it is clear that I am a fan of the show. Does anyone here really think Dave Bedford is a fan?

It shouldnt necesarily be one single post that results in banning someone. In isolation I probably wouldnt ban Dave Bedford either, but after reading many of his posts it is clear he is not here to comment on the show. He is here to wage a vendetta against Dave, and on a fansite I dont want to read that.
By bmstinton93
#452553
Tbh Dave Bedford is a twat and yes this is a fansite and I agree with what you're saying but Chris has always just run this with little moderation and I personally like it that way. Who cares what one person thinks about Dave? We all know he's wrong.
User avatar
By What
#452557
Travis Bickle wrote:There is something wrong with this so called fansite when some nasty, vindictive troll comes on here (EDIT: Dave Bedford) and routinely slates an integral member of the show because of some ridiculous, illogical agenda yet only gets rebuked for typing 'lol'.

Is this a fansite or is it not? Fans post constructive views, good or bad. They dont wage unhinged vendettas against crucial members of a show they claim to be fans of.


The lol rule is stupid anyway. Stopping people from typn leik th1s is one thing but disallowing common internet speak is silly.
User avatar
By Yudster
#452560
Lol is ridiculous and should never be used outside of a text message.

I agree with Nic that people's opinions shouldn't be censored. I don't like censorship.

I agree with Chrysostom that DaveBedford is a - well, he used lots of words where one would have done, but I agree.

I understand Travis Bickle's frustration but is he actually saying that DaveBedford shouldn't be allowed to be a member here? That I can't agree with. Although as I said, I totally get Travis's point, I just don't think it matters that much.

I also think I get where DevilsDuck is coming from, I have thought since his split with Jayne that he has changed, and not in a way that I particularly like, but I really would miss him if he went and I think he'll be fine again. He was great in the opening link today for instance where they were discussing the whole Twitter thing from yesterday. He absolutely loved it by the way Cat!
User avatar
By Wykey
#452567
What wrote:
Travis Bickle wrote:There is something wrong with this so called fansite when some nasty, vindictive troll comes on here (EDIT: Dave Bedford) and routinely slates an integral member of the show because of some ridiculous, illogical agenda yet only gets rebuked for typing 'lol'.

Is this a fansite or is it not? Fans post constructive views, good or bad. They dont wage unhinged vendettas against crucial members of a show they claim to be fans of.


The lol rule is stupid anyway. Stopping people from typn leik th1s is one thing but disallowing common internet speak is silly.


w?

Imsycuwills?

Oitoyc? Arwdwbcis?
User avatar
By a-moron
#452573
What?

I'm mighty surprised you can't understand why internet language looks silly?

Or Is this ordinary youth culture?

And right, who doesn't want badgers * inside'm someday?
User avatar
By DaveBedford
#452577
Travis Bickle wrote:
DevilsDuck wrote:I am not a troll, I just honestly think Dave has passed his best and wouldn't be missed that much if he left. He still has his moments where the old Dave shines through, but on the whole I think he has turned into an arrogant, grumpy, and not so comedy Dave. You on the other hand are a complete * moron!


Dave Bedford was rebuked for using text speak. I was calling him a troll, not you.


I make plenty of posts on this forum, which I enjoy reading. I have seen people with far bigger "agendas" about something or other and it goes unnoticed. But the fact I think Vitty brings nothing to the show hits a raw nerve with some people. Witness the kind of names I was called! Do other people get this when they express distaste with someone.

Why can't we just agree to disagree and not have this discussion EVERY time I comment about Vitty please? It just ruins a thread and I have no wish to do that.
User avatar
By a-moron
#452578
DaveBedford wrote:Witness the kind of names I was called! Do other people get this when they express distaste with someone.


Ach, just grow a pair big Davie B. What did you excpect, it's the same reaction every time you post about Dave on here. You should be used to it by now.
*, *, *, *, *, *.
*
*
*!

See, it's just a word. No need to be all 'woe is me' about it.
If you * stand the heat, don't rub Ralgex on yer baws whilst masturbating.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#452581
DaveBedford wrote:Do other people get this when they express distaste with someone.

Why can't we just agree to disagree and not have this discussion EVERY time I comment about Vitty please? It just ruins a thread and I have no wish to do that.


If they are as vitriolic as you, then yes they do. I refer you to Qwerty's post about Matt Fincham, for example. That led to Aled posting asking him to stop. Not only did he not stop, but he personally attacked anyone who asked him to. You won't be surprised to hear that the worst examples of this were deleted.

If you don't want this discussion, you could maybe consider making your posts less hateful and more constructive?
User avatar
By DaveBedford
#452591
Ok no problem.

I found the "foe" thing. Very handy.

Thanks badger, I have been called a lot worse, water off a duck's back mate. I suppose I am more used to the other forum I use where that sort of stuff isn't allowed. Anyway it's just the internet, let's take it easy.
User avatar
By a-moron
#452597
DaveBedford wrote:Thanks badger, I have been called a lot worse, water off a duck's back mate. I suppose I am more used to the other forum I use where that sort of stuff isn't allowed. Anyway it's just the internet, let's take it easy.


I only use this forum so I'd be * if I joined another one. I thought this was the norm. That we got to sign up and rip the tits out of whoever was being particularly * that day.

Glad to hear you made it through unscathed and remember, the internet is not for 'taking it easy', that is what the Red Shoe Diaries on late night channel 5 was for.
User avatar
By a-moron
#452598
theflyingbadger wrote:...was being particularly * that day.


Oh come on. That's not even a proper a sweary word. That's along the same lines as 'being a bit of a bawbag' or 'acting like a fanny'. Are these censored out? Well I have no idea as it doesn't sweary filter you when you type. But if they aren't censored then they bloody well should be.

Minge, how about that one, that has always came across cruder than the c word, is it filtered? Again I have no idea. I really should go and check these out.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#452599
You can disable your swear filter here.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Sat and today are up

Changes at Radio One

Scott Mills is finally getting a Breakfast Show, a[…]