- Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:37 pm
#391992
Why is everyone glossing over the fact that "the 4th, 3rd and 2nd last words" are in fact "to anger BBC" and not as Mugs has stated "bound to anger"?!
I win, not Mugs.
Mugs wrote:Sarah Nathan, The Sun wrote:GOBBY Chris Moyles branded Graham Norton's new show rubbish yesterday in an outburst bound to anger BBC chiefs.
I present to you the first paragraph and draw your attention to the 4th, 3rd and 2nd last words "bound to anger"
This to me shows the article is a work of opinion not fact. Nowhere in the article did she present her opinion as fact by claiming it came from sources inside the BBC or otherwise.
I win :D
Why is everyone glossing over the fact that "the 4th, 3rd and 2nd last words" are in fact "to anger BBC" and not as Mugs has stated "bound to anger"?!
I win, not Mugs.
Missed a Podcast? Visit the Podcast Archive. Also available, the Video Archive and my Sound Clip Archive.
"I don't ... don't get ... i'm no good at ... at down there. I get really confused in that area. I get confused down there. I don't know what's what. I really don't." - Chris Moyles, BBC Radio 1, 7:26am Fri 30th April 2010
"I don't ... don't get ... i'm no good at ... at down there. I get really confused in that area. I get confused down there. I don't know what's what. I really don't." - Chris Moyles, BBC Radio 1, 7:26am Fri 30th April 2010