chrismoyles.net
- Mon Jun 23, 2008 7:42 am
#347755
What?! Surely if I was The Doctor, then my disguise would be sufficiently brilliant to fool even the most vigilant and observant individual, making your speculation of my false identity the only evidence needed to disprove it. Even beyond that is the fictitious nature of The Doctor's existence. Well...I suppose it would be possible for the fictitious characterisation to be a part of the masquerade you alluded to - to create doubt of such a persons existence through the means of supplanting the idea of such a character as nothing more that a story - although that would imply that I had access to creative process behind the making of the show, which I do not. Well...I suppose I wouldn't have to have continued access to the production if a synapse-altering, multi-faceted apparatus was used to upload a correctly calibrated, quasi-conceptional matrix into neural-pathways of the creators, although the process would need to be repeated to account for the change in personnel over the years. Well...that is of course unless the original idea would be enough to convince the population of the supposed fictionality of The Doctor, without the need for specific data. Still though, that would require me to have performed such a procedure numerous years before my own birth. Well, I suppose that on the off-chance that your assessment is correct, then the ability to wander the avenues of time would make that particular obstacle a non-issue.
Despite all of this, I can assure you that any such connection between myself and whatever possible reality of this fictitious persona are purely coincidental and lack any meaning or substance.
Despite all of this, I can assure you that any such connection between myself and whatever possible reality of this fictitious persona are purely coincidental and lack any meaning or substance.
