Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#334582
tom greeni wrote:What Is the best comeback, EVER ? :D The favorite comeback of a school kid " Your mum " Smooth !


That doesn't work, it's got to be "Yer maw!".
User avatar
By Console
#334584
charlalottie wrote:Actually, it wouldn't be a spelling debate, it would be a grammatical one.


Actually, it wouldn't be a grammatical debate, it would be a semantics one.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#334587
Bonanzoid wrote:
tom greeni wrote:What Is the best comeback, EVER ? :D The favorite comeback of a school kid " Your mum " Smooth !


That doesn't work, it's got to be "Yer maw!".

Strangly enough, I was on my way to typing that exact answer.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#334607
Bonanzoid wrote:there aren't either any adverbs in that sentence. The word you'll be looking for is verb.

Usually, I'd have a go for the same reason, but I always get parts of speech like that mixed up, I'm terrible for remembering which is which.
User avatar
By TIAL
#334610
I've never heard of 'Yer maw!'

It's always been 'Your mum!'
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#334613
It's Scottish. And "your mum" sounds too posh, the way I'm thinking it'd be said.

"Well, sire, the joke is on you, for once had intimate relations with one's mother one eve past!"
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#334614
That was meant to read "for [/]one[/b] had...". I hate when one typo alters the meaning of the entire phrase.
User avatar
By SpaceBoy
#334617
Console wrote:
charlalottie wrote:Actually, it wouldn't be a spelling debate, it would be a grammatical one.


Actually, it wouldn't be a grammatical debate, it would be a semantics one.


No it would not be a semantics debate. You will find that I was right when I said about linguistics. Linguistics is made up Divisions, specialties, and sub-fields.

Theoretical linguistics is a division made up of particular specialities of study and Semantics is the study of meaning in communication. The fields that are generally considered the specialities of theoretical linguistics are syntax, phonology, lexis, phonetics, pragmatics, morphology, and semantics. And don’t get me started on Applied linguistics again a division, with all those specialities including psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, cognitive linguistics, language acquisition, linguistic anthropology, descriptive linguistics and computational linguistics. But the main word which covers all these fields of study would be linguistics!

Linguistics wins!
User avatar
By TIAL
#334621
Bonanzoid wrote:"your mum" sounds too posh


Not if said in a thick London accent :D
User avatar
By Console
#334633
SpaceBoy wrote:
Console wrote:
charlalottie wrote:Actually, it wouldn't be a spelling debate, it would be a grammatical one.


Actually, it wouldn't be a grammatical debate, it would be a semantics one.


No it would not be a semantics debate. You will find that I was right when I said about linguistics. Linguistics is made up Divisions, specialties, and sub-fields.

Theoretical linguistics is a division made up of particular specialities of study and Semantics is the study of meaning in communication. [..]

Linguistics wins!


While it is correct to say that it is linguistics, it is also correct - and, indeed, more specific - to say that it is semantics. Otherwise you could say: Actually, it wouldn't be a linguistics debate, it would be a language one.
User avatar
By Andy B
#334644
Just to attempt to get this back on some sort of topic.

Whenever I fancy someone, I use the same tries an tested tactic that has worked for me for years. I run up to them, shout "I love you", push them, hopefully so they fall over then run off laughing! It worked with my first girlfirend (age 5) so I'm guessing it still works now.
User avatar
By Yudster
#334652
Andy B wrote:Just to attempt to get this back on some sort of topic..........


No, don't - this thread illustrates perfectly the point that's been made elsewhere about the number of pointless stupid threads there are on the boards at the moment. Fact is, the thread was pointless so everyone started talking about nothing. And in fact, talking about nothing was far more entertaining than the original pointless topic (which mightn't have been quite so pointless if it weren't, in general terms at least, already being discussed elsewhere).
User avatar
By Andy B
#334656
Isn't this section of the forum for exactly that though. Off topic discussions I.e everything that's not related to the CMS? Surely if you don't like a topic then don't post in it and it disappears. If you want different thread topics then surely it's up to people to create threads they WOULD like to talk about.

I'm far too lazy and unimaginative to create my own topics so I just generally post in other people's. If it weren't for Viv's inane ramblings then I'd probably still only be a newbie! But then again I'm a big fan of random so that's just me.
User avatar
By Yudster
#334814
Andy B wrote:Isn't this section of the forum for exactly that though. Off topic discussions I.e everything that's not related to the CMS? Surely if you don't like a topic then don't post in it and it disappears. If you want different thread topics then surely it's up to people to create threads they WOULD like to talk about.

I'm far too lazy and unimaginative to create my own topics so I just generally post in other people's. If it weren't for Viv's inane ramblings then I'd probably still only be a newbie! But then again I'm a big fan of random so that's just me.


Probably. I'm just having a phase, is all.
rachel1989 wrote:Stay out of the chatrooms if its bothering you that much.


What the hell have chatrooms got to do with anything? And don't tell me what to do missy.
User avatar
By rachel1989
#334920
Yudster wrote:
Andy B wrote:Isn't this section of the forum for exactly that though. Off topic discussions I.e everything that's not related to the CMS? Surely if you don't like a topic then don't post in it and it disappears. If you want different thread topics then surely it's up to people to create threads they WOULD like to talk about.

I'm far too lazy and unimaginative to create my own topics so I just generally post in other people's. If it weren't for Viv's inane ramblings then I'd probably still only be a newbie! But then again I'm a big fan of random so that's just me.


Probably. I'm just having a phase, is all.
rachel1989 wrote:Stay out of the chatrooms if its bothering you that much.


What the hell have chatrooms got to do with anything? And don't tell me what to do missy.

That wasn't aimed at you....
User avatar
By Andy B
#334932
Watch out for Yudster - she bites.
User avatar
By Vivienne
#334934
Yudster wrote:
Andy B wrote:Just to attempt to get this back on some sort of topic..........


No, don't - this thread illustrates perfectly the point that's been made elsewhere about the number of pointless stupid threads there are on the boards at the moment. Fact is, the thread was pointless so everyone started talking about nothing. And in fact, talking about nothing was far more entertaining than the original pointless topic (which mightn't have been quite so pointless if it weren't, in general terms at least, already being discussed elsewhere).


It wouldn't have been pointless had it been picked up properly.. as it was, people randomly started to post about ice-cream. I honestly believe that since you've got your mod status in the Chatroom, you've become increasingly bossy.
User avatar
By Andy B
#334935
For a moment there I thought I had been created a Mod....I was always more of a rocker though...ahh those great days in Brighton....
User avatar
By Vivienne
#334936
No, I'd never say anything bad about you. You're cool. I like yuds too (mostly), but recently she's been more & more up her own backside, bossing people about.
User avatar
By Yudster
#334960
rachel1989 wrote:
Yudster wrote:
What the hell have chatrooms got to do with anything? And don't tell me what to do missy.

That wasn't aimed at you....


Sorry rachel - even if it had been aimed at me it was an unwarranted piece of snapping. I'll try to be nicer.