Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#399286
Probably someone who many on here wouldn't know but...

Barry Letts, Producer of Doctor Who from 1970-1974, has passed away. He was the Producer of all of Jon Pertwee's era of Doctor Who as well as Tom's first story when he took over.

http://www.examiner.com/x-10643-Dr-Who- ... 4-19252009

:(
By bradcali
#399310
I know Barry Letts very well.I'm a huge Doctor Who fan and really enjoy watching and listening to his contributioins to the classic Dr Who DVD releases.was really sad to hear of his death yesterday. He had been suffering from cancer for a year or 2 apparantely.R.I.P Barry :(
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#399311
bradcali wrote:I know Barry Letts very well.I'm a huge Doctor Who fan and really enjoy watching and listening to his contributioins to the classic Dr Who DVD releases.was really sad to hear of his death yesterday. He had been suffering from cancer for a year or 2 apparantely.R.I.P Barry :(


Yes he had had chemotherapy recently and was recovering well, sadly however he lost his battle in the end. :(
User avatar
By McGuinness-89
#399343
This is nearly as depressing as Michael Jackson dying,I was about 10 when Boyzone were at there peak and Stephen Gately was my favourite because he had the same first name as me,and he spelt it right. :(
User avatar
By SAV1OUR
#399344
Oh and indeed no.

Smiling through the sadness and shock - listening to the Boyzone interview from last year, hadn't heard it before.

Image

I remember seeing the papers while I was at college in '99 when he came out - it was a very big deal.

It's clear to see why 'No Matter What' featuring his vocals was such a hit.


RIP.
User avatar
By Zoot
#399349
bradcali wrote:Former Boyzone singer Stephen Gately has been found dead at 33 http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Showbi ... _The_World .Bit of a shocker that


Former? Well, I know he's former now he's died, but he was still a boyzone singer before that - my sister saw them live 2 weeks ago.
Quite a shock though.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#399355
Very sad news. But still:

1) this doesn't belong in General
2) there's already an "oh no, they've died" thread
3) why put "lead singer" in the thread title? why not put "Stephen Gately"? it's obvious why. It's cos you're trying to shock people by making them think it's Ronan Keating who's passed away. A cheap trick. (And before anyone says it, I know Stephen did a lot of the lead vocals in Boyzone too, but there's no denying tht people do think of Ronan as the 'leader' or 'frontman' of the group.)
User avatar
By foot-loose
#399357
nicola_red wrote:2) there's already an "oh no, they've died" thread

Which he posted the story in about half an hour before starting this thread.

nicola_red wrote:3) why put "lead singer" in the thread title? why not put "Stephen Gately"? it's obvious why. It's cos you're trying to shock people by making them think it's Ronan Keating who's passed away. A cheap trick. (And before anyone says it, I know Stephen did a lot of the lead vocals in Boyzone too, but there's no denying tht people do think of Ronan as the 'leader' or 'frontman' of the group.)

Seconded.

Bradcali, fair enough and start shite threads with no real point or evidence to back you're points up - if that's what keeps you happy then fill yer boots. Don't, however, try and earn brownie points by being the "guy in the know" when someones died. It makes you look like a bit of a wank.
User avatar
By catherine
#399364
Is that the same sister that got you tickets to see Michael Jackson? She's becoming a tad of a jinx, someone block her ticketmaster account!
User avatar
By Yudster
#399374
Stephen Gately - I wonder what on earth happened to him? Poor lad. Oh no.
User avatar
By Munki Bhoy
#399380
foot-loose wrote:Bradcali, fair enough and start shite threads with no real point or evidence to back you're points up - if that's what keeps you happy then fill yer boots. Don't, however, try and earn brownie points by being the "guy in the know" when someones died. It makes you look like a bit of a wank.


Sometimes the "guy in the know" when someone dies is the murderer.

See what I did there? I implied bradcali could have killed Stephen Gately. Now, I don't think that for a second, but I thought it would be a good way to illustrate the kind of idiot posting style which cause so much friction. An idiot posting style bradcali is notorious for.
User avatar
By Munki Bhoy
#399383
Almost all deaths are sad. Some come as being inevitable. Some are a relief. Some are a tragedy. This one just leaves me thinking... what the *?

I'm almost looking forward to the post-mortem. If that makes sense.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#399390
Lactating Man Nips wrote:First time - shame on bradcali.
Second time - shame on you.

Nothing anyone says changes anything. There's more forum clutter created by the haterz than his posts/threads. Count 'em up.

Yea, well - i've not had a go at him before so it's my turn. He's a lumpy bit of * and i'm tired.
By wireman2004
#399391
i know that bradcalli usually comes out with alot of useless shit.

BUT.

I did not know the news until coming on here. Working in a warehouse and all. So the news today from bradcalli has come in useful for once.

SO...

Nicola_red for starting the blatent be littleing of bradcalli today. And everyone else who has put their bit of a dig in. (most putting the dig in just for the hell of it)
I find todays comments from yourselves towards bradcali out of order. He did the basics. Stated the facts. And posted the link to direct us. (as people like johnny. Yudster and others have moaned at him to do) so the be-littleing and the abuse that has come from yourselves is pretty un-called for. And borderline bullying tactics.

There seems too be some apologies that should come. But i doubt that the people who've posted these posts will apologise.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#399393
My point, and Nicolas, isn't that he had posted the news, my point is that he had posted it in one thread (where the news is MEANT to go) then started another topic in what seems like his usual style of being "the one in the know". I thought that, considering the topic, it was in pretty bad taste.

Why should I apologise for that?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#399411
wireman2004 wrote:Nicola_red for starting the blatent belittling of bradcalli today. And everyone else who has put their bit of a dig in. (most putting the dig in just for the hell of it)
I find todays comments from yourselves towards bradcali out of order. He did the basics. Stated the facts. And posted the link to direct us. (as people like johnny. Yudster and others have moaned at him to do) so the be-littleing and the abuse that has come from yourselves is pretty un-called for. And borderline bullying tactics.

There seems too be some apologies that should come. But i doubt that the people who've posted these posts will apologise.


Sorry, but there's not a chance in hell I will apologise for posting my opinion. I didn't use personal insults or off-topic abuse, I certainly have no intention of bullying anyone and I was in no way having a dig "just for the hell of it", so I don't see I have any reason to. He did not simply state the facts - he twisted them to make himself and his thread look more interesting and 'in the know', as usual. We all know that bradcali pays no attention to what people say anyway, he just carries on posting his rubbish, so I doubt you have any need to take on the role of cheerleader for him. I hope I've made myself clear.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399419
The main difference between wireman and bradcali is that the silly little tosser that is bradcali is marginally more coherent than than the even sillier and littler tosser that is wireman.
User avatar
By nade
#399421
I think this thread should be deleted, a post had already been put into the "On no, they've died!" thread 38mins before this new thread was created.

The reason Footloose started "Oh no, they've died!" was because Chris had originally said that it would restrict these sort of posts to one place. So i'm not sure what Chris & Console think about it and if they would agree?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#399484
Beadle Poke wrote:nicola_red is an idiot. HOWEVER, she is willing to show you her tits/knees (lovely girl) so I don't tell her how much of a tosser I think she is just in case she decides to send me a pic of her skaggy boobs. Did I just say that out aloud?


Still waiting for that pic huh? I'm sorry to disappoint you. I might get down the list to your email address eventually, so don't give up hope! Joining the bradcali/wireman camp is unlikely to help your cause tho. In fact it may lead to you being unable to continue bringing up the topic of my boobs at all, because, like them, you'll lose the ability to compose a coherent sentence in English.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#399488
nade wrote:I think this thread should be deleted, a post had already been put into the "On no, they've died!" thread 38mins before this new thread was created.

The reason Footloose started "Oh no, they've died!" was because Chris had originally said that it would restrict these sort of posts to one place. So i'm not sure what Chris & Console think about it and if they would agree?

Do we even have mods on here these days? Console seems very quiet and Chris must have other things on his plate. Sunny is always on the nightshift as well.

I'll do it. I'll be fair. Honest. :twisted:
  • 1
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 111

Sat and today are up