Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.

Has the show improved since the afternoons?

Yes
13
39%
no
3
9%
very little
5
15%
its even better
7
21%
dont care aslong as you dont bring coxy back
5
15%
User avatar
By Ell Mc
#137461
I was just wondering what people thinck about the show now?Because i think it is still as good as it was!
User avatar
By Sidders
#137474
What's the difference between the first option and the 4th option?
User avatar
By HoTdOg
#137477
lmao sidla i read this about 15 mins ago and never clicked....
User avatar
By Ell Mc
#137495
Sidla wrote:What's the difference between the first option and the 4th option?

yes means its alright and even better means its brilliant
By MC
#137500
Yep, I think it has improved.

It has freshened things up anyway. The only thing I still don't like about the show is Chris talking during/interrupting the news...
By Aaron
#137502
Thats alright I think. He doesn't do it with the important news and it's funny when he talks about the stuff like Janet Jacksons tit hanging out but then again he could do that after the news...
By jimmy g
#137503
But what he says during the news is rarely funny. It was better when he used to get just a clip of them screwing up the news and play it back to them afterwards.

I would say the show is better overall because it has more money.
By MC
#137504
Jimmy G wrote:But what he says during the news is rarely funny.


I agree. Most of the time it's just a bit cringeworthy listening to it and it's like he feels he has to say something just for the sake of it. If he wants to chat about the stuff in the news that day then wheres the harm in doing it after the bulletin has finished?
User avatar
By Ahh_Pathetic
#137514
it feels like more effort is being put in an there are less links where nothing at all is being said.
By Guest
#137538
Jimmy G wrote:But what he says during the news is rarely funny. It was better when he used to get just a clip of them screwing up the news and play it back to them afterwards.

I would say the show is better overall because it has more money.

Nooooo.
All wrong.
For instance, take the clone thing that was on the news on tv adio etc. a few days a go.
What was that name again?
User avatar
By Adam
#137539
I Want err.. Cake wrote:
Jimmy G wrote:But what he says during the news is rarely funny. It was better when he used to get just a clip of them screwing up the news and play it back to them afterwards.

I would say the show is better overall because it has more money.

Nooooo.
All wrong.
For instance, take the clone thing that was on the news on tv adio etc. a few days a go.
What was that name again?


Woo Suk Hwang
By jimmy g
#137543
I Want err.. Cake wrote:Nooooo.
All wrong.
For instance, take the clone thing that was on the news on tv adio etc. a few days a go.


Didn't he say all that at the end of the news anyway. If he didn't he could have. It's just an awful idea, I like my news and this just messes it up.

As thingy says, there are fewer links with nothing in, there used to be loads of reference of filling or padding.
User avatar
By Quincy
#137571
i missed the first couple of weeks of the breakfast show, after listening to virtually every afternoon show since '98. i think at worst it is as good as the afternoons show, and quite a few bits are better.

as people have said not so much padding and not so many stupid features that last only a week or two (eg. daves dictionary definitions) tho that was part of what made it funny, stupid, made up on the spot features.

after listening to the breakfast show now i would conclude that it is slightly better than the afternoon show. (by this i mean better than excellent!)
User avatar
By Ahh_Pathetic
#137604
it amuses me that people are so concerned about a crappy 2 minute news bulletin.
User avatar
By Quincy
#137606
i dont think its needed to talk during the news, just talk after. its not as if the R1 newsbeat bulletins r that long, abut 2mins or something. i dont see why they decided it was a good idea.
By Dopey
#137623
Quincy wrote:i dont think its needed to talk during the news, just talk after. its not as if the R1 newsbeat bulletins r that long, abut 2mins or something. i dont see why they decided it was a good idea.

I think it's posibly because people used to like moyles talking to the news readers and so they thought it would be good to see if they liked this new style.
By David
#137628
He doesn't talk during the news so much now.

The breakfast shows are deffinetly better. The last few months of afternoons were lacking something, and there werent really going anywhere. There is deffinetly so much more effort put into it now, and it is sounding so much better. Wheter or not it is still like that in a year, I dont know.

Plus having the breakfast show, Moyles is now getting the promotion on the rest of Radio One and the BBC that he deserves :P there was rarely ever a trail for moyles in the afternoon.
User avatar
By Ell Mc
#137738
David wrote:Plus having the breakfast show, Moyles is now getting the promotion on the rest of Radio One and the BBC that he deserves :P there was rarely ever a trail for moyles in the afternoon.


i couldnt agree with you more