Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#162398
Sidla picked the only person stupider than himself.
User avatar
By Andy Bkr
#162400
everton left it late last night didnt they? did you see spurs goal(unbelievably disallowed) referees are a disgrace this season well done on getting beatie im proved wrong
User avatar
By Betti911
#162412
Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog wrote:people are so stupid slagging off the police.


I presume if that sentence were a paint it would be hint of sarcasm or are you really a secret agent Gaspode?
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#162432
no i was being serious. try living without them.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#162437
Hmm I agree there should be some sort of law enforcement, but it seems to me that most of our coppers are bent.
User avatar
By Betti911
#162442
But who guards the guards....... an age old question?

I'd prefer the whole eye for an eye kind of justice. Right enough when the police screw up its all to the lawyers advantage. Still I don't like that kind of 'justice'. S'not why I went into law.
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#162447
Topher wrote:Hmm I agree there should be some sort of law enforcement, but it seems to me that most of our coppers are bent.


name 6.

name and shame topher. we want facts.
User avatar
By Lucie
#162500
Betti911 wrote:But who guards the guards....... an age old question?

I'd prefer the whole eye for an eye kind of justice. Right enough when the police screw up its all to the lawyers advantage. Still I don't like that kind of 'justice'. S'not why I went into law.


What exactly do you mean by an 'eye for an eye kind of justice'? :?
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#162505
someone pushes me i should be able to kill their first born.

seems fair to me.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#162520
Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog wrote:
Topher wrote:Hmm I agree there should be some sort of law enforcement, but it seems to me that most of our coppers are bent.


name 6.

name and shame topher. we want facts.

I know it's not fact, it's my opinion, that's why I said "it seems to me".

My aunt's boyfriend for a start, anyway.
User avatar
By Betti911
#162537
Lucie wrote:
Betti911 wrote:But who guards the guards....... an age old question?

I'd prefer the whole eye for an eye kind of justice. Right enough when the police screw up its all to the lawyers advantage. Still I don't like that kind of 'justice'. S'not why I went into law.


What exactly do you mean by an 'eye for an eye kind of justice'? :?


Fair recompense for a wrong and decent protection for the victim of a crime. People need to see that proper punishment is being dished out otherwise they'll think its a free for all. At the moment we have a system of punishment that protects and cares for the accused not the victim.
User avatar
By Lucie
#162569
Betti911 wrote:
Lucie wrote:
Betti911 wrote:But who guards the guards....... an age old question?

I'd prefer the whole eye for an eye kind of justice. Right enough when the police screw up its all to the lawyers advantage. Still I don't like that kind of 'justice'. S'not why I went into law.


What exactly do you mean by an 'eye for an eye kind of justice'? :?


Fair recompense for a wrong and decent protection for the victim of a crime. People need to see that proper punishment is being dished out otherwise they'll think its a free for all. At the moment we have a system of punishment that protects and cares for the accused not the victim.


Yes well that's all very well and good but the reality is very different. This 'eye for an eye' ideology is quite frankly ridculous - how can you right a wrong with another wrong. Then when a punishment for murderer ends with the 'murderer' being killed and 10years later it is found that he/she is infact innocent then you're pretty b*ggured really..
User avatar
By Betti911
#162626
Its called fair recompense for the victim Lucie.... if you're looking for fairness don't look at any kind of legal system. They are all corrupt in some shape or form.
User avatar
By Lucie
#162630
Betti911 wrote:Its called fair recompense for the victim Lucie.... if you're looking for fairness don't look at any kind of legal system. They are all corrupt in some shape or form.


Yes well obviously nothing and nobody is completely unbiased - but an eye for an eye apathy is utterly childish and solves nothing especially when you start to take it literally.

But that's just my opinion ... :wink: 8)
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#162635
you wont win lucie. its like fighting against an annoying jelly.
User avatar
By Lucie
#162639
Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog wrote:you wont win lucie. its like fighting against an annoying jelly.


haha. - it keeps bouncing back?
User avatar
By Sidders
#162642
Topher wrote:
Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog wrote:
Topher wrote:Hmm I agree there should be some sort of law enforcement, but it seems to me that most of our coppers are bent.


name 6.

name and shame topher. we want facts.

I know it's not fact, it's my opinion, that's why I said "it seems to me".

My aunt's boyfriend for a start, anyway.

Also, Sergent Lambert, the one who tried to * my brother over.

Lucie wrote:haha. - it keeps bouncing back?

I told him he should lose weight.