Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
#311760
Has anyone ever seen a fireworks show where the fireworks are as constant and regular as foot-loose's signature? You don't allow much time for the person running it to go back and light another one! Unless said person is Claire from Heroes, he may be hurting somewhat by the end of it.
#311762
It's all done with magnets these days mate.

anyway, just to stir it up a tiny bit more, in my job I work with a lot of different cashiers every day and consistently the ones who are lazy and stupid and really don't want to work are white british people, give me an African or an Eastern European any day of the week cos they work their arses of in my shop.
#311763
Topher wrote:Has anyone ever seen a fireworks show where the fireworks are as constant and regular as foot-loose's signature? You don't allow much time for the person running it to go back and light another one! Unless said person is Claire from Heroes, he may be hurting somewhat by the end of it.

Hmm

Theres only so much you can do with a 60kb limit.
#311764
I love your sig at the moment footy, it's gorgeous. I hope you have a good one lined up for Christmas.
#311765
foot-loose wrote:
Topher wrote:Has anyone ever seen a fireworks show where the fireworks are as constant and regular as foot-loose's signature? You don't allow much time for the person running it to go back and light another one! Unless said person is Claire from Heroes, he may be hurting somewhat by the end of it.

Hmm

Theres only so much you can do with a 60kb limit.

Ha I know, I'm only taking the piss.
#311774
"..like what Australia has."

Am I the only one who thinks it's an appaling use of grammar then? Granted my spelling isn't always up to scratch but that's just because I'm lazy and can't be bothered and most of the time I think quicker than I can type so it comes out a bit garbeled but "Like what Australia has."

It's the old gag, talk proper English like what I do....

And I was merely pointing out that Console on occasion does seem to favour the correct useage of punctuation, spelling, grammar etc...
#311781
Ballbag wrote:I think poor grammar is the least of his faults Mr B.

Dunno haven't read most of this thread. Mainly because although we're all allowed to voice our own opinions...except for Footloose (I've banned him from having opinions for the day as part of my being ruler of the world) it's one of those debates that could go on and on forever.

No-one likes bloody foreigners except when they need a toilet cleaned. Bout sums it up I think.
#311784
Andy B wrote:because although we're all allowed to voice our own opinions...except for Footloose (I've banned him from having opinions for the day as part of my being ruler of the world)

If you impose baw chopping off, then I will happily elect you to be the ruler of the world.

Chop everyones baws off*. All problems sorted.


*this is not an opinion from today, this is the same opinion as voiced on Saturday.
#311787
markool89 wrote:but as for ballbag, why would you say that? your the kind of people that is ruining this country!

For someone who said he wasn't going to say any more on the subject, you're still spewing shite from your keyboard.

Just accept that some people find you a vile racist and get on with it. Or (better) change your views and people won't find you a vile racist any more.
#311789
Right Mark, I believe Andy was joking, but I don't believe you are.
Secondly Mark, I too was joking.
Your reply to both has been once again, appalling, ill-thought and I would go so far as to say, wrong.

To quote you, "your the kind of people that is ruining this country!" (although I would have worded it better)
#311797
I'm chopping the baws off this thread and insisting that from now on all crimes are punished by having ones baws chopped off.

Vote Andy for world leader.

And yes the views on toilet cleaning are not my own but are the perceived views of most people who read the Daily Mail. My own views on foreigners are fully detailed in one of my previous posts but like me no-one else reads them.

I know, we should just get rid of all the ones who don't want to work. Let them in if they've got a good education in areas we are lacking in and want to work hard, and of course let them in if they are fleeing persecution from an oppresive government regeime of course but the rest of em should be kicked out.

After having their baws chopped off (one for Foots there)
#311801
No-no, we only chop the baws off the people who get kicked out, but once I'm world leader there will be one huge country and everyone will need permission to move anyway which will need to be authorised by me or my deputy anyway so we won't have any of these problems.
#311802
markool89 wrote:omg i meant left wing(or right wing i dont know what it is!)
right lets flipping end this thread right here!!

END END END END END.


You can't run away from it now just because you have lost the plot Mark. The problem is that you absolutely don't know your left wing from your right wing, or your right wing from your wrong wing - but you think you do. Or at least, you think you know enough about it to churn out terrifyingly facile, fascist and xenophobic propagander - and then you demonstrate that you don't even understand what YOU have said, let alone what anyone else has said, but you are nevertheless going to stand by it rigidly, even though you haven't a clue (by your own admission) what you're talking about! You need to stop talking and start listening (to some people with a broader experience of the world than seems to have been the case so far), and maybe stop typing and start reading some of what the people who really DO know what they are talking about have said. Even if you end up still in favour of strictly curtailing - or even ending - immigration, at least let it be a conclusion you reach with the REAL facts and figures clear in your mind, and free from the emotive garbage of the tabloid press.
#311803
Yudster wrote:the originator of this thread was banned for expressing his views in an inciteful way - your racism there was expressed much more overtly than his was

The original poster joined to stir things up so I banned him as he didn't really appear to have much to contribute, nor did he have any substance to his arguments. If a member of the board wants to out himself as a closet racist, then you all go for your lives.

ps: it's propaganda
#311804
Andy B wrote:No-no, we only chop the baws off the people who get kicked out, but once I'm world leader there will be one huge country and everyone will need permission to move anyway which will need to be authorised by me or my deputy anyway so we won't have any of these problems.

I can see us being quite busy...

That will annoy me. I will want to chop off more baws when im annoyed. That will make me busier. That will annoy me more. Its a horrible never ending circle.
#311853
Chris wrote:
Yudster wrote:the originator of this thread was banned for expressing his views in an inciteful way - your racism there was expressed much more overtly than his was

The original poster joined to stir things up so I banned him as he didn't really appear to have much to contribute, nor did he have any substance to his arguments. If a member of the board wants to out himself as a closet racist, then you all go for your lives.

ps: it's propaganda


I knew that looked wrong. Should have thought about it for longer. I wasn't suggesting that you should ban him Chris, just trying to get him to look at what was going on around him. Failed I think.
#311854
Topher wrote:Has anyone ever seen a fireworks show where the fireworks are as constant and regular as foot-loose's signature? You don't allow much time for the person running it to go back and light another one! Unless said person is Claire from Heroes, he may be hurting somewhat by the end of it.


Is this a joke, or are you really this pickie :? ?