Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Zoot
#312910
This is just like Scooby Doo!

And she woulda gotten away with it to if it wasn't for you pesky kids...
User avatar
By Console
#312911
Yudster wrote:Yep, we all had our suspicions, nice to have them confirmed!


Did she really need to * the reply for it to be confirmed; their posting styles are identical (something to which I had been subtly alluding to for most of this thread).
User avatar
By Yudster
#312913
If I was feeling really pedantic I would correct Console's grammar at this point.
User avatar
By Yudster
#312914
Console wrote:
Yudster wrote:Yep, we all had our suspicions, nice to have them confirmed!


Did she really need to *-up the reply for it to be confirmed; their posting styles are identical (something to which I had been subtly alluding to for most of this thread).


Okay, the semi-colon should have been a comma, and you used the word "to" twice, this is tautological and removing either one woulod render the phrase correct.
User avatar
By Sunny So Cal
#312916
Wow, I go to bed and it all kicks off. Stupid 8 hour time difference...
For some reason I'm reminded of the old adage, "With age comes wisdom." Are we sure she (he?) wasn't born in '98?
User avatar
By MK Chris
#312918
So, presumably, a few weeks ago in the chat room when a message was posted by scamp88, which was allegedly written to "Matt" on MSN, but posted in the wrong window (how the hell you can get an MSN window mixed up with the chat window for this forum is beyond me anyway) hinting about a video being for "your eyes only", was in fact, completely posted on purpose, as I suggested at the time.

That may sound pompous but I quite like being right so I don't care.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#312920
Sunny So Cal wrote:Are we sure she (he?) wasn't born in '98?

It's reasonably likely that the person concerned is female and around about the age she said she was; she posted a photo of herself at the Moyles signing not long ago. Of course it's possible that's not her, but unlikely I'd think.
User avatar
By Yudster
#312922
She worked so hard at it, and then messed up so easily! What a shame!
User avatar
By foot-loose
#312923
NightyNight wrote:
Ballbag wrote:Hey matt4scamps, why don't you and Scamps come into the chat room together, so we can sort this all out?


Why do you want us to come into the chatroom together?

That is the best example of a tit I have ever seen.

Congratulations.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#312924
Hmm, what are the chances of seeing her again?

Not very big (not using any of those usernames anyway) I should imagine.

foot-loose wrote:
NightyNight wrote:
Ballbag wrote:Hey matt4scamps, why don't you and Scamps come into the chat room together, so we can sort this all out?


Why do you want us to come into the chatroom together?

That is the best example of a tit I have ever seen.

Congratulations.

I've seen better tits. But that is a good one.
User avatar
By Yudster
#312926
It was just so complete, I loved it. She'll be back though, with a different name. Or three.
User avatar
By Yudster
#312930
Well I'm sure Chris could do that, but whether he really wants to or not is another matter!
User avatar
By Yudster
#312933
NightyNight wrote:
Ballbag wrote:Hey matt4scamps, why don't you and Scamps come into the chat room together, so we can sort this all out?


Why do you want us to come into the chatroom together?


No, THAT'S entertainment.
User avatar
By Console
#312936
Matt4Scamps wrote:dont worry I wont be botherin yous anymore, this was all mere entertainment


Just so you know, we (the moderators and admin) can see the IP addresses people post from, which means we can easily see the four (currently) accounts you are using to post. I should be grateful if you would just stick to one.
User avatar
By Andy B
#312941
Told you this was getting intersting. Although I've run out of popcorn now. It's like a badly writeen episode of Johnathon Creek!
User avatar
By Bruvva
#312948
Andy B wrote:Told you this was getting intersting. Although I've run out of popcorn now. It's like a badly writeen episode of Johnathon Creek!


That implies there was a well written episode of Johnathon Creek and I don't believe that for a second.
User avatar
By Andy B
#312950
Alright then, pie in the sky or that one with the woman and her sone, sure she was named after a flower or something, and wasn't there one with two sisters or something...I'm crap with detective programmes me, Poirot is about it for me, oh and of course Colombo.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 9