Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
#313182
I can alread hear Cat shouting at us and telling us that we take it all too seriously...

PC Pro wrote:A team of US software developers is developing a "StupidFilter" that will block unintelligible posts from internet message boards.

Once the software is installed on a webserver it will scan posts before they are published for nonsense terms including "OMG!!" and "LOL", blocking the worst offenders with a message that says "This comment is more or less unintelligible. Please try to restate it."

According to the team's frequently asked questions page, the filter will be targeting "comments with too much or too little capitalisation, too many text-message abbreviations, excessive use of 'LOL', exclamation points, and so on."

The FAQ does go on to note a few sticking points, including the fact that the filter is "blind to irony", making clever posts somewhat redundant, and that dividing stupidity from mere carelessness is always going to be a tricky proposition, a problem it intends to deal with by creating a rating system for each post.

Despite the inherent challenges the team clearly feels the project is worth the effort, noting that "effective textual communication requires at least some formal rigour, and we feel such rigour is worth encouraging and, at times, enforcing."

The team is currently asking users to visit its site and help them rate a selection of idiotic YouTube posts on a scale of one to five.

The filter is expected to be released in December, with a Firefox plugin for self-censorship to follow at a later date.


Article: Pc Pro

That said, this forum is fine - but some i've seen are terrible.


loool.
#313188
I think it's brilliant.

If I were writing it, the error message would be more insulting.
#313193
Why do we need it? We have Console, S4B, Topher and Me!
#313197
Nope, - if in doubt, take out the other names and see what is right. In this case, we are saying "We have......". So it's We have Console, We have S4b etc. Well, you wouldn't say "We have I", would you? It's "We have Me".
#313200
That wouldn't be wrong, but it isn't the same thing. The context didn't suggest that Myself was appropriate in that case.
#313202
Sorry...........!
User avatar
By S4B
#313203
Topher wrote:I think it's brilliant.

If I were writing it, the error message would be more insulting.


I agree Topher although I also agree with Yudster that between us we're more than capable of correcting the cretinous on here ;)
#313712
She will, too.........
#313810
She will, too.........