Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
#314220
foot-loose wrote:"loool", however, is perfectly acceptable. (I assume it's to indicate something that is funnier than "lol" but not so funny as "rofl".)

Someone on here (Bridgie I think) used to say "lolololol" a lot.

foot-loose wrote:As is "whu". (whu = who. Brilliant!)

Yeah - and others which also don't shorten the word at all (which I can't think of right now, but I'm sure there are some.)
#314226
Viv 113 wrote:I often wish I had more to worry about than whether choon is spelt tune or choon or anything else.


We're not worried about it; 'choon' is obviously spelt 'choon', but as it's a made up word (or at least a bastardisation of another word) it's meaningless.
#314241
See, I can almost picture how one could end up in the situation where "pmsl" applies. But "lmao" is just wrong.

That said - hearing the bumpkins that phone up to Mills to tell him that they "laughed so much a little bit of wee came out" does make me cringe.
#314286
foot-loose wrote:*moves "The Best Sheep Jokes Book in the World - Volume 2" to one side*

not a thing, i work up there a fair bit.


Save it for the Welsh, foots. :)

Would it be any consolation if I said I was off almost all Glaswegian origin? :D