- Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:05 pm
#327944
That's not what I asked. Are you directly offended by them? Do you fall into the category of people that you feel Moyles is forgetting?
Because there is no apparent intention to cause harm, and it's only with a very limited view that they can be deemed offensive. Even then, it would have to take an overly sensitive person to actually become 'hurt' by a simple generalisation of 'everybody'. You can please some people all of the time, and all people some of the time, but never all of the people all of the time. And sometimes there's just people that you can never win with and just have to forget. It is impossible to constantly be considering the feelings of every person on the planet, and, frankly, pathetic to expect a person to do so. Get over it, the world isn't perfect.
Sotonian wrote:Indeed I am offended by the choice of words but I thought that would have been obvious by now.
That's not what I asked. Are you directly offended by them? Do you fall into the category of people that you feel Moyles is forgetting?
Sotonian wrote:I have explained why I find the choice of words offensive now it's your turn to explain why failing to recognise that the words used could be offensive and upsetting to some you feel it right to defend them.
Because there is no apparent intention to cause harm, and it's only with a very limited view that they can be deemed offensive. Even then, it would have to take an overly sensitive person to actually become 'hurt' by a simple generalisation of 'everybody'. You can please some people all of the time, and all people some of the time, but never all of the people all of the time. And sometimes there's just people that you can never win with and just have to forget. It is impossible to constantly be considering the feelings of every person on the planet, and, frankly, pathetic to expect a person to do so. Get over it, the world isn't perfect.