Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#328872
I tend to just kinda gloss over these sorta things in the news, but I've been watching this story develop for the past while and it's sickened me.

BBC News wrote:Soldier kidnap plotter given life

Khan had extreme Islamist views, the judge said
A man who planned to kill a Muslim soldier serving in the British Army has been jailed for life.
Parviz Khan, 37, from Birmingham, admitted the plot and to supplying equipment to the Taleban last month.

He planned to snatch the serviceman and decapitate him. Four others have also been found guilty over the plot.

On Monday, a Leicester Crown Court jury cleared Amjad Mahmood, 32, from Birmingham, of knowing about the plan but failing to inform authorities.

Khan was told he would serve a minimum of 14 years.

'Absolutely serious'

The security services had placed a bug in Khan's Alum Rock home, and this provided much of the evidence in the case.

Sentencing, Mr Justice Henriques said Khan had extreme Islamist views and was a fanatic.

"It's plain that you were absolutely serious and determined to bring this plot to fruition," he said.

Prosecutor Nigel Rumfitt QC told the court Khan was "enraged" by the notion of Muslim soldiers in the British Army.

Mr Rumfitt said: "Khan decided to kidnap such a soldier with the help of drug dealers operating in Birmingham. He would be taken to a lock-up garage and there he would be murdered by having his head cut off like a pig.

"This would be filmed - they would have the soldier's ID to prove who he was and the film would be released through Khan's terrorist network to cause panic and fear with the British armed forces and the wider public."

Khan wanted to burn the soldier's body and parade his head on a stick, the court heard.

He was claiming benefits of more than £20,000 a year while he was organising the plot.

The court also heard that he indoctrinated his small child with hate, getting him to chant that he hated various figures, including Tony Blair and George Bush.

In November 2006 the security services recorded a conversation Khan had with co-defendant Basiru Gassama.

Khan was heard outlining his plan: "We give the judgment... well then cut it off like you cut a pig, man.

"Then you put it on a stick. Then we throw the body, burn it, send the video to the chacha (uncles, a term for Mujahideen leaders in Afghanistan or Pakistan).

"This is what they call you will terrorise them, they will go crazy. They will start searching... London, Birmingham, Newcastle, where are these people?"

Khan explained the soldier would be befriended by drug dealers before being kidnapped in the city's Broad Street district.

The jury was told that Khan had wanted Gassama, a Gambian national, to help identify the victim of the plot.

But when Gassama had failed to provide details of a target, the plan "lay dormant" after July 2006, Mr Rumfitt said, only to be revived in November 2006.

The court heard Khan was the hub of the cell which organised four shipments of equipment to armed groups based in Pakistan and operating against coalition forces in Afghanistan.

'Fanaticism and fantasy'

The men were arrested in a series of high-profile raids in Birmingham at the end of January last year after an investigation led by West Midlands Police Counter-Terrorism Unit.

The officer who led the operation said Khan had been determined to carry out the plot, which he believed had been "at least supported" by al-Qaeda.

Detective Superintendent Liam O'Brien said: "I strongly believe that if we hadn't taken action when we took it, we would be sitting here now talking about the kidnap and murder of a British soldier among other things."

He would not say how far the plot was from being carried out when they intervened.

Khan's QC, Michael Wolkind, said in mitigation that his client's plot had been a "mixture of fanaticism and fantasy".

Referring to the covert monitoring of Khan, he said: "If there had been a genuine threat, the buggers would have stopped it much earlier. There was a long way to go."

Media leaks

Mr Justice Henriques also criticised leaks which led to reports of the plot in the media shortly after the men's arrests, saying they constituted a "very grave contempt of court".

An inquiry by the Metropolitan Police failed to discover the source of the leaks.

Gassama, 30, of Hodge Hill, Birmingham, pleaded guilty at a previous hearing to a failure to disclose information about the plot.

He was jailed for two years. He will be released as he has already been in custody for 381 days, but it is recommended he is deported.

Mohammed Irfan, 31, of Ward End, Birmingham and Zahoor Iqbal, 30, of Perry Barr, Birmingham, both pleaded guilty to engaging in conduct with the intention of assisting in the commission of acts of terrorism - namely helping Khan to supply the equipment.

Irfan was jailed for four years and Iqbal jailed for seven years.

Hamid Elasmar, 44, of Edgbaston, Birmingham, who was found guilty of the same charge, was jailed for three years and four months.



How the HELL can these people think that what they are doing is going to benifit them or the rest of their religion??

I am a very tolerant person - race / religion doesn't often really come into anything as far as i'm concerned: as long as you arn't buggering up anyone elses life, i'm cool with whatever. However, frankly, when I read things like this the first thing that comes into my head is "if you don't like it here, f*ck off to wherever you came from and live there. Quit trying to make our country like yours."

These are the people who are the first to complain about racist / religious differences but then they go and do something like this ... what do they expect?! It's all well and good to say "you can't tar everyone with the one brush" but it's the nutcases that are getting all the bad press. I might be being very ignorant by saying this and if so, then I apologise, but since this is such a minority that believe that these sort of actions are the way forward, what are the rest of the people in the religion doing to stop them? If this was my religion - I would want to know what was being done to stop the constant stream of negative and downright disturbing press which it was receiving. And I mean something a damn site better than some random spokesman on News 24 saying "we do not condone this behaviour at all blah blah."

On the upside, I am glad to see that the system worked. This **** should be left to rot for the rest of his days in the sh*ttest conditions possible. And the same goes for anyone who knew about this and did nothing about it.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#328876
Personally I don't believe these people are religious at all.. whatever your views on religions are, they are not here to incite hatred. The people who do this like to hide behind religion, but that's just bollocks. That's my understanding anyway.

That said, I agree that they should throw the f*cking key away.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#328878
Im aware that I am looking at this from a completly different point of view from them and it's an issue that everyone will view differently based on their beliefs, but I simply cannot understand the logic that "my religion tells me to do this therefor I must". If I was being told that not only commiting such a horrible murder but doing it deliberatly to incite fear, hatred and grief to others (including others in my own religion) then I would have to seriously ask what the f*ck I was doing associating myself with such things.

It's not even like they are in another country where this belief is maybe a bit stronger and there is a stronger chance of there being propeganda - it's here in the UK where they can see for themselves what life is like. They actively cover up what they are thinking to friends and family because they know what would happen if they talked about it.


The other thing I don't get is what they want in the first place - what is it they are actually fighting for?

On a happier note, I'm glad to see that there is a pet dog that has worked out how to hitch a ride on a ski lift at some skislope in Scotland. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/nor ... 251195.stm ... Things are looking up already.
User avatar
By S4B
#328882
Footy I agree with everything you've said. I believe that, to Muslims, their religion is a way of life. To my mind any way of life that incites violence or hatred of other living creatures is wrong. I do, however, know a few Muslims and they are very peace loving, respectable people who don't condone the way that the radicals are acting.

That said one of my Muslim friends has asked a non-Muslim to marry him but only on the grounds that she convert to his faith, give up alcohol and raise any children in his faith. He can't see that this is a problem for her. However when I suggested he did the same for her so that she would marry him he thought I had lost my mind. He's such a nice guy and they're so much in love it breaks my heart that if she even has a glass of wine he will call the whole thing off no matter how much he loves her and ask his family for an arranged marriage.
User avatar
By Zoot
#328884
Footy has got this whole 'newsreader' thing down to a tee - he's even got the 'and finally' bit in!
User avatar
By Yudster
#328886
S4B wrote:That said one of my Muslim friends has asked a non-Muslim to marry him but only on the grounds that she convert to his faith, give up alcohol and raise any children in his faith. He can't see that this is a problem for her. However when I suggested he did the same for her so that she would marry him he thought I had lost my mind. He's such a nice guy and they're so much in love it breaks my heart that if she even has a glass of wine he will call the whole thing off no matter how much he loves her and ask his family for an arranged marriage.


Interesting. Islam forbids having relationships outside of the faith, not just marrying outside it - so if he is fully committed to Islam, surely he has already stepped outside the boundaries it places on him, and having her convert wouldn't make any difference to that. From this it looks like he is not fully committed to Islam, so must have some other reason for wanting to impose his control on his girlfriend like this. It must be "love".

Or perhaps this is just an illustration of what has been said here already - that there is a huge difference between a faith by which you live your life, and a religion which apparently allows you to "pick and mix" the bits you like without worrying about the bits you don't like. And obviously I'm not confining that to Islam.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#328887
Zoot wrote:Footy has got this whole 'newsreader' thing down to a tee - he's even got the 'and finally' bit in!

This has just got my goat, zoot. And it is well documented that I don't like others touching my goat.
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#328891
It pisses me off that some people can come here and do that. I don't mind immigration, but if an immigrant breaks the law majorly, or maybe a series of minor offences, they should be deported, end of.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#328892
...to add to Bonanzoid's comment, they should not expect to come over here and claim benefits forever and ever amen. They need to earn their money if they wish to live over here.
User avatar
By kendra k
#328893
Yudster wrote:Or perhaps this is just an illustration of what has been said here already - that there is a huge difference between a faith by which you live your life, and a religion which apparently allows you to "pick and mix" the bits you like without worrying about the bits you don't like. And obviously I'm not confining that to Islam.


this is an excellent point, yudster. i also think topher's right that it's not really about religion- it's about culture and feeling powerless. it just happens that lots of people who are un happy with the word and very angry take up the guise of religion to make them feel empowered and give their cause a feeling of higher purpose. of course, living in america i have a different view of this than those of you in the uk because i seriously don't think that we have the same levels of militant islamists living within our borders. (note- islamists are not the same thing as muslims.) the muslim religion can't be blamed for this- most likely some practitioners capitalizing on the fact that there's a lot of angry people in the world.

it really reminds me of clovis going around waging war under the guise of spreading christianity. it just happened that it was a convenient excuse for him to do what he wanted.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#328902
Topher wrote:...to add to Bonanzoid's comment, they should not expect to come over here and claim benefits forever and ever amen. They need to earn their money if they wish to live over here.

To add to Topher and Bonanzoids comment:

BBC News wrote:He was claiming benefits of more than £20,000 a year while he was organising the plot.

?!?!?!?!

We are paying him to come up with the plan!

It's all f*cked up.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#328915
foot-loose wrote:
Topher wrote:...to add to Bonanzoid's comment, they should not expect to come over here and claim benefits forever and ever amen. They need to earn their money if they wish to live over here.

To add to Topher and Bonanzoids comment:

BBC News wrote:He was claiming benefits of more than £20,000 a year while he was organising the plot.

?!?!?!?!

We are paying him to come up with the plan!

It's all f*cked up.

Yeah, I noticed that.. that's why I said it.
User avatar
By Boboff
#328921
Ironic it's now costing us £37,000 a year to keep him in prison though!

The general consensus is it's all f*cked up anyway, but what is the solution?

People of all faiths and backgrounds have extreme views, and as a society we have to deal with them.

We use the law to do this, the law can be an ass.

But then again you can teach a dog to ski, so its not all bad.

A chap in Plymouth last week was banned from driving for just 18 months following a crash where he mounted the pavement and put 4 people in Hospital, 2 were critical for nearly 4 months. He was twice over the drink drive limit, and it was 4 in the morning. A friend of mine moved his car 30 yards off the main road to a car park at 10 at night when twice over the limit and got a two year ban, it makes no sense what so ever.
By Ballbag
#328922
foot-loose wrote:
Zoot wrote:Footy has got this whole 'newsreader' thing down to a tee - he's even got the 'and finally' bit in!

This has just got my goat, zoot. And it is well documented that I don't like others touching my goat.

I'm sorry foots, who's goat did you say it was?


Anyways, I'd like to know what Markool's views are on this subject.
User avatar
By rustybike
#328923
I totally agree with what you're all saying, ESPECIALLY
foot-loose wrote: "if you don't like it here, f*ck off to wherever you came from and live there. Quit trying to make our country like yours."

These are the people who are the first to complain about racist / religious differences but then they go and do something like this ... what do they expect?! It's all well and good to say "you can't tar everyone with the one brush" but it's the nutcases that are getting all the bad press. I might be being very ignorant by saying this and if so, then I apologise, but since this is such a minority that believe that these sort of actions are the way forward, what are the rest of the people in the religion doing to stop them? If this was my religion - I would want to know what was being done to stop the constant stream of negative and downright disturbing press which it was receiving. And I mean something a damn site better than some random spokesman on News 24 saying "we do not condone this behaviour at all blah blah."


but what's even more terrifying, is that there are people out there, and in the news, who are born and raised in this country, who don't have religious views or any huge influences (not that that's an excuse), and yet they kill and torture people all the time! Jon Venables and Robert Thompson spring to mind and more recently the Garry Newlove story.

My personal opinion is bring back the death sentence or at least something far worse than a cushy little prison sentence (which will never actually be what was originally given in the first place) as well as a cosy prison cell, part time labour and a spot of exercise every now and again. Courtesy of tax payers.

In countries far far away I’ve heard that thieves get their hands cut off, rapists and that sort get their goolies chopped off... I know it sounds rather extreme, but it would sure as hell make me think twice before I did anything.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#328926
I've already made my opinion of the death penalty clear (I am strongly anti-capital punishment.)

I do think prison should be tougher than it is and sentences should be longer. I would vote for any political party (except the obvious extreme ones like the BNP and National Front) who would promise that any violent crime gets a minimum 10 year sentence. I could go out and break someone's nose today and get off with a caution because I've got no previous convictions; that is wrong.

As far as Jon Venables and Robert Thompson are concerned, as they were only 10 years old when they committed their terrible act, it's a difficult one to call. I do think in cases like those, as well as the perpetrators of the crime being punished, the parents should be too. Invariably in cases like these, this being no exception (and most when the murderers are adults too) they have a dreadful family background. That is no excuse because you still have a choice of paths to take, but people who do take the murderous route were nearly always neglected, beaten and / or abused as kids.

Take Steve Wright, on trial at the moment for the murders of the five Ipswich girls. The jury is about to retire and consider their verdict as soon as the judge has finished summing up; if he's found guilty (which, without wishing to have preconceptions, I imagine he will be, going by what I've read about the case, which is by no means comprehensive), people will attempt to delve into his history and find out what his childhood was like. I'd bet my bottom dollar that he was a neglected child. Again, if he did do it, that's no excuse; he still had a choice of whether or not to go out and kill these people, but there is no doubt that your upbringing as a child shapes who you become as an adult.
User avatar
By Zoot
#328927
boboff wrote:Ironic it's now costing us £37,000 a year to keep him in prison though!

The general consensus is it's all f*cked up anyway, but what is the solution?

People of all faiths and backgrounds have extreme views, and as a society we have to deal with them.

We use the law to do this, the law can be an ass.

But then again you can teach a dog to ski, so its not all bad.

A chap in Plymouth last week was banned from driving for just 18 months following a crash where he mounted the pavement and put 4 people in Hospital, 2 were critical for nearly 4 months. He was twice over the drink drive limit, and it was 4 in the morning. A friend of mine moved his car 30 yards off the main road to a car park at 10 at night when twice over the limit and got a two year ban, it makes no sense what so ever.


A couple of years ago, our secretary was in a car with her sister, her best mate and her best mates Boyfriend (He was driving). It was about 7 in the evening in the middle of summer, and pissing it down, although it was still quite light. They were going to a pub in the country for something to eat. As they were traveling through the winding lanes they were hit head on by a nova who was on the wrong side of the road (Verity described it to me as 'Rally Driving round the corner'.) Verity had a shattered hip and was off work for 6 months and has had 3 operations. Her sister broke her leg in 3 places. The driver in their car had severe seat belt laserations and a ripped liver. Verity's Best friend Natasha died on the scene, as did the passenger in the other car. The other driver had a sprained wrist. He got banned from driving for 8 months.
User avatar
By rustybike
#328928
To say "he/she had a violent family background... so thats why he attacked that person" is surely a "get out of jail free" card? Don't get me wrong, family upbringing and family history can be a huge factor of future psychological issues and/or opinions but persoanlly, thats not good enough.
Surely there are enough programmes on the television these days and articles in the news to show someone that murdering or raping someone is not right in this world...
No matter how badly they were treated as a child, as an adult with so many influences around them today, surely they are your own person eventually with opions, views and beliefs to decide what their movements are?? But that's just my opinion - i'm not saying that family upbringing DOESN'T have an impact to your way of thinking; it must do. I just believe that you will eventaully grow up with your own opinions and beliefs via school, friends, college, work, work collegues, television, books, newspapers, you name it. There are enough things around these days to change your path.

I know people who were mentally abused by their so called parents, and rather than believing that what happened to them was right it instead made them even stronger about making sure their children were given a life that they didn't have.