Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349082
Fair enough.. I don't know much about the prize money side. All sports are like that though.
User avatar
By Munki Bhoy
#349161
Quiz time. What describes Andy Murray's situation in his native tongue and rhymes with "toot"...

That's the end of the hill/mound/ridge/bog/whatever for another 12 months then. Nadal blew him away.
User avatar
By timp
#349162
Yeah he did...a Federer/Nadal final is looking even more inevitable.
User avatar
By Andy B
#349165
AAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Murray Sucks (not mints)

Can't stand tennis. It's teh only sport I passionately don't like.

Murray's gonna be another Henman who wins sod all but get's treated like a hero because he's the best of a crappy bunch!
User avatar
By S4B
#349167
Bugger! There goes the book sales.

*phones the publisher to ask for a return*
User avatar
By Andy B
#349168
What's the book, Andy Murray "From cot to court"?
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349192
I actually don't think he's a bad player and one day I believe he will win a Grand Slam.. however, he needs to up his game considerably in order to do that and to beat the top three players.

Anyway.. I'll not say anything about the match itself, I'll just sit here smuggly.
User avatar
By Yudster
#349245
Andy Murray is only one year younger than Nadal. One year. Nadal has been winning stuff - big stuff - for years and years. This should be all you need to know to tell you that Murray will NEVER win a slam event. Never. He simply doesn't have what it takes.
User avatar
By timp
#349254
Don't you think different players take different lengths of time to peak? I think Andy Murray could end up winning something, if and only if he significantly ups his game.
User avatar
By SAV1OUR
#349259
Image
This is what Yudster means, never knew he was only a year away from Murray, they couldn't look more different.
User avatar
By Vivienne
#349261
The one on the left is gorgeous... the one on the right, an ugly mug.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349262
Yudster wrote:Andy Murray is only one year younger than Nadal. One year. Nadal has been winning stuff - big stuff - for years and years. This should be all you need to know to tell you that Murray will NEVER win a slam event. Never. He simply doesn't have what it takes.

I see what you're saying, he'll have to improve no end to be able to beat the likes of Nadal before he can win a Grand Slam and that is a big ask. It's the key as to whether he can win one and I hadn't thought properly about that before making the statement. Neither player is at their peak yet, but it is true that Murray is unlikely to catch up with Nadal.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349287
No point in predicting the finalists, they're all pretty much a foregone conclusion.. an all-Williams ladies (in the loosest sense of the word) final and a Rafa-Federer final is almost inevitable. The outcome of the mens is going to be interesting though. The outcome of the ladies isn't.
User avatar
By Yudster
#349291
timp wrote:Don't you think different players take different lengths of time to peak?

Yes, but Murray would have to be considerably higher up the slope at this stage of his career for the peak to be higher than ATP tournaments. He'll certainly win a few of those (if he hasn't already done so....he has, hasn't he?). But the only way he'll win a slam is if everyone else is sick or injured.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349294
I believe he's won four or five of the more minor ATP tournaments. I couldn't tell you which ones.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349428
I wonder if the hype surrounding Laura Robson is as justified as it sounds.. I've not seen her play yet, but a 14 year old in the junior semis isn't to be sniffed at, not when the juniors includes everyone up to 18. Perhaps she could be our first decent woman since the days of Virginia Wade and Sue Barker. Annabel Croft didn't make it..
User avatar
By Yudster
#349430
Annabel Croft was never particularly good. She was more famous for her hair than her tennis.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349432
She was a bit before my time and had given up before I took an interest.
User avatar
By Yudster
#349437
Topher wrote:I wonder if the hype surrounding Laura Robson is as justified as it sounds.. .

She's just this second secured a 2-0 victory in her semi final, so you never know....!
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349438
Topher wrote:I wonder if the hype surrounding Laura Robson is as justified as it sounds.. I've not seen her play yet, but a 14 year old in the junior semis isn't to be sniffed at

Correction.. in the junior girls final now! Fantastic.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349439
Ahem.. what Yudwuk said!
User avatar
By Yudster
#349440
I wonder if her final will get covered? I wouldn't be surprised, I don't think we've had a junior in a final for aaaaaaaaages - have we?
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349441
I believe that last junior final was Annabel Croft in 1984. It certainly was for the girls and I don't think we've had a junior boy in the final since then either. They are certainly few and far between, even before that.

I hope it does get covered, just rewards for a cracking performance.. knocking out the number one seed en route.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#349442
Correction.. according to Wikipedia, some lad named Miles Kasiri represented us in the junior boys final in 2004. The name sort of rings a bell, but I don't remember a big thing made about it.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8