- Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:59 am
#368996
Why not? I don't want to fund a sterile, sanitized, over-filtered politically/racially/culturally correct-to-the-pont-of-nonsense broadcasting company, which is where we seem to be heading. I want the BBC to provide a service for people with enough sense and understanding to recognise a joke, to laugh at themselves occasionally, and not to take offence simply because the Daily Mail says they should. I don't want a free for all on obscenity and genuinely offensive broadcasting, I just want the BBC to apply a bit of common sense and reason to the corporation's policies. I really can't see why this is so difficult.
Ben from Leeds wrote:On a publicly funded radio station?
I think not.
Why not? I don't want to fund a sterile, sanitized, over-filtered politically/racially/culturally correct-to-the-pont-of-nonsense broadcasting company, which is where we seem to be heading. I want the BBC to provide a service for people with enough sense and understanding to recognise a joke, to laugh at themselves occasionally, and not to take offence simply because the Daily Mail says they should. I don't want a free for all on obscenity and genuinely offensive broadcasting, I just want the BBC to apply a bit of common sense and reason to the corporation's policies. I really can't see why this is so difficult.
Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.