The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By MK Chris
#368676
OK, let's go through this slowly to ensure you understand...

  • This site and forum is 100% unofficial. It has no affiliation to Moyles or the BBC.
  • Google Ads are automatic based on the text on the page - if you run an Atheist web site that details why you disagree with Christianity, for example, and have Google Ads on that page, you're likely to at least sometimes get ads for Christian companies.
  • The ads are only visible to guests, not to registered and logged in members.
User avatar
By Yudster
#368681
bigblue2brighton wrote:does the bbc know about this? it is surely a conflict of interests, having someone ho is paid by the beeb being connected to another channel..

Who here is being paid by the BBC you imbecile? Eh?
By Mooaura
#368688
Yudster wrote:
bigblue2brighton wrote:does the bbc know about this? it is surely a conflict of interests, having someone ho is paid by the beeb being connected to another channel..

Who here is being paid by the BBC you imbecile? Eh?


One assumes Aled doesn't do his job for free...
By bigblue2brighton
#368694
ok, calm down.. chris moyle has a contract with bbc, to do the show. right?

if his name/likeness is used on this site, surely the bbc woulnt not allow competing channels to trade off 'their' man?
User avatar
By Yudster
#368697
Aled is a contributing member on this site - nothing more. He certainly doesn't get paid for being here. And the images used are all in the public domain.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#368700
In any case, Moyles has done various TV jobs on non-BBC channels including Sky whilst doing a show on Radio 1. Amazing!
User avatar
By Boboff
#368709
bigblue2brighton wrote:does the bbc know about this? it is surely a conflict of interests, having someone ho is paid by the beeb being connected to another channel..

Do you work as a journalist for the Mail perhaps?

If so your degree in Media Studies did little to improve your grammar and spelling.

Topher very kindly explained the situation, I hope it clears things up for you.

Now * off and pick on someone else, or perhaps go and find a story that people may want to read, and is in the public interest, you know something old fashioned like righting wrongs or educating people?
User avatar
By foot-loose
#368740
bigblue2brighton wrote:ok, calm down.. chris moyle has a contract with bbc, to do the show. right?

if his name/likeness is used on this site, surely the bbc woulnt not allow competing channels to trade off 'their' man?

You know - you're being shat on from a high height in here. Just thought I would point that out.

Nae luck.
User avatar
By Andy B
#368797
I think it's disgraceful. I was watching "The Villa" the other day on and it had Chris's voice and what channel is The Villa on? Sky TV! Coincidence? I think not.

Also I was watching a show on ITV no less and in the break was an advert for wine which had Jo Whiley's voice.

And if you are inclined to believe such rumour and speculation, the Internet is rife with talk of Chris doing a panel quiz show thing but everyone says it will be on Channel 4. I mean how stupid are they? Chris works for the BBC!

Idiots the lot of em. I shall be writing a letter of complaint to Greg Dyke and my MP and the lead singer of Echo and the bunnymen calling for someone's resignation.

I blame Matt Fincham.
User avatar
By S4B
#369911
That Spambot has posted everywhere! Console must be having a day off the forum, actually I haven't seen a post from him for a while is he still alive?
User avatar
By MK Chris
#369972
He seems to have lost interest in posting since She Who Cannot Be Named was banned.
User avatar
By Yudster
#370007
I don't imagine he needed kidnapping.
User avatar
By Sunny So Cal
#370029
Console was alright last week because I wished him a happy Christmas and he replied. I know he's been busy trying to finish up some projects before the year ended. This seems to be a far more reasonable account of his time than being kidnapped and forced to be Voldemort's sex nerd -- ha, though not as amusing.
User avatar
By SAV1OUR
#370036
They were a good double act, they say the best sitcoms involve characters with very different personalities confined to a room by fate - This was true of that pair, on this here intimate forum - and was entertaining, but like all good comedy, was killed off while it was still great viewing.