The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By Zoot
#371615
Chris just announced that he filmed an episode of this while he was away Although he's not sure when the episode will be broadcast, the series starts next week.

Edit - he's been bumped down to series 7...
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#371618
Yeah, another example of Mr Moyles having his collective audience passed over....

Granted, his TV work has never been quite the marvel of his radio work, but still - talk about kick in the clankers!!!!!!!
User avatar
By Yudster
#371663
Nikki is a lot prettier than Aled though.
#371665
Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel
User avatar
By Zoot
#371683
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


To be fair he's been alot more controversial than that in the past.
#371692
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


Listen again is fine now - I'm listening to the hilarious Beyonce remix as I type.
User avatar
By Yudster
#371711
He was only teasing - he and Will Young are pretty good friends I think.
By tina11
#371810
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


I despair of the British media, but I think this might be the reason: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... 4896026.jp
It was originally reported on in the Daily Mail, but I couldn't bring myself to post a link to that publication.
#371811
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


It is not available on iPlayer but if you click/copy and paste the following link it works fine.
rtsp://rmv8.bbc.net.uk/radio1/moyles_tue.ra
User avatar
By Andy B
#371818
iPlayer worked fine for me yesterday.....
#371844
tina11 wrote:
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


I despair of the British media, but I think this might be the reason: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/s ... 4896026.jp
It was originally reported on in the Daily Mail, but I couldn't bring myself to post a link to that publication.


Another quote taken completely out of context, it's obvious what he meant was people visit it for historical reasons.
#371857
wildthing wrote:
Mrs_Barlow_no2 wrote:Does anyone know why listen again is not online for todays show and the beeb are saying it wont be up at all, is it to do with his Ulrika rant and being rude (funny though) to the mother who text in, and the controversial thing he wanted to air about Rachel


It is not available on iPlayer but if you click/copy and paste the following link it works fine.
rtsp://rmv8.bbc.net.uk/radio1/moyles_tue.ra


I imagine it's because our work PC's don't have real player on them but if not then that link is down now as well :(
#371887
Johnny 1989 wrote:Another quote taken completely out of context, it's obvious what he meant was people visit it for historical reasons.

He did - and isn't it stupid that people will complain about it, when in reality all of the concentration camp sites in Europe are frequently visited by all sorts of ghouls, freaks and perverts who have no connection with anything that went on there, but obscenely wish they did? People go there to film themselves wearing Nazi costumes, to act out various sick sexual fantasies, to indulge in whatever the hell it is that gratifies them. If I was one of the people who had a legitimate reason to visit, or even a genuine connection with the history of them, that's what I would be shouting about.

No. I'm not saying that's what Moyles was talking about, he can't have been - I was just wanting to say that there are far more serious defamations of the places and the history than a mere joke from a DJ.