in4308 wrote:Johnny 1989 wrote:has inspired me to lose some weight
Me too, i've lost around 1 1/2 stone so far. Just need to keep going as I was listening to Radio 1 (during chris' climb) when I was loosing it.
Congratulations to you, I hope to shift about 1 1/2-2 stone before I go to visit my cousin in Hong Kong round about October/November time. Dam it, it's time for me to stop staying up late (thus having a lack of energy the next day) get back on the Wii, and give up cheese & bread for a while (Cheese will be quite easy for me, even though I love it, however bread can be a weakness for me, I shall have to swap it for pasta most days of the week)
Yudster wrote:Johnny 1989 wrote:The reason he's still classed as obese is due to the BMI, which is being questioned by health professionals at present. For example Sir Steve Redgrave was classed clinically obese because he's 18 stone, but he's 18 stone of muscle. That's why Moyles is probably still classed as obese, although now I'd say chunky. He does look better slimmer though & has inspired me to lose some weight (I bloody need to as well )
Thats actually not true - the BMI is calculated using three variables, height, weight and body fat percentage. If calculated properly with these three variables, Steve Redgrave would have a very healthy BMI. Unfortunately though it seems to have become accepted that you calculate BMI from height and weight only, which gives stupid results because its simply wrong. It all stems from a misuse of the term BMI, which is a clinical measurement, not a domestic one.
Yes it seems to be these days, when I was last weighed at my doctors he weighed me & measured my height & didn't once mention my fat percentage (the Wii did but I'm not going to share that with everyone
). I'd imagine if that had been taken into account with Sir Steve then he wouldn't have been classed as obese at all.
Regards, Johnny 1989
The Chris Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:
Ongoing updates in the Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:New Thread updated Weekly