[Cookie]

Seriously. Could people raise the standards on these boards? It's so boring, monotonous and crap on here. No wonder Chris Moyles gives so many less mentions than Unofficialmills gets.

Long live Unofficialmills.

[Yudster]

Seriously. Could people raise the standards on these boards?

Apparently not.

[Munki Bhoy]

Someone in FHM used to refer to their vagina as their "cookie".

You fill in the rest.

[john-leybourne]

Seriously. Could people raise the standards on these boards? It's so boring, monotonous and crap on here. No wonder Chris Moyles gives so many less mentions than Unofficialmills gets.

Long live Unofficialmills.

Has Scott got nothing else to fill the show with?

[Yudster]

Someone in FHM used to refer to their vagina as their "cookie".

You fill in the rest.

Do you not want to then?!

[Cookie]

Seriously. Could people raise the standards on these boards? It's so boring, monotonous and crap on here. No wonder Chris Moyles gives so many less mentions than Unofficialmills gets.

Long live Unofficialmills.

Has Scott got nothing else to fill the show with?

There's more on the show than comments about unofficialmills. UM write nice things about Scott, which is why Scott responds so well. On here, people just post boring shite, usually copied from unofficialmills.

[Yudster]

I think its pretty much taken as read that people on here are fans of Chris' - its a reasonable assumption to make. Which might be why we don't "write nice things" all the time. I'm sure there would be other reasons too.

I'm ever so interested in who is copying what from UM! I'm not on that forum (although I know a fair few from here are) - which bits have been recycled?!

[Ed Pummelon]

This appears to be a thread saying my message board's better than your message board, but I'm assuming I've missed something. Surely nobody would have so little going on in their life that they felt they needed to write that.

Could someone tell me what's really going on?

[Cookie]

People can't get it right on here. Chris has so often damned you in the past, yet you continue to post crap. Did you do anything for his birthday, the way unofficialmills did for Scotty? Huge effort there.

Look at some of the topics on here - When Will Chris' next holiday be, The Naughty List, The Nice List. Get a * life.

[Zoot]

People can't get it right on here. Chris has so often damned you in the past, yet you continue to post crap. Did you do anything for his birthday, the way unofficialmills did for Scotty? Huge effort there.

Ok, the big burning question - If you hate this site so much, then why are you on here? You're just torturing yourself!

[Cookie]

I'm on to urge you to raise standards. I'm going to go soon. Your avatar is a bore. Get a * life.

[Johnny 1989]

Someone in FHM used to refer to their vagina as their "cookie".

You fill in the rest.

It's got to be either Jenna Jameson or Terra Patrick, am I right? If so what's my prize or do I not get one due to BBC terms & conditions....

[Yudster]

Why do it so rudely? And I'm the one without a life, not Zoot...........

[Zoot]

I'm on to urge you to raise standards. I'm going to go soon. Your avatar is a bore. Get a * life.

Haha, oh please stay, really, we could do with some fun.

[Console]

Look at some of the topics on here - When Will Chris' next holiday be, The Naughty List, The Nice List. Get a * life.

Some of the topics in the 'The Scott Mill Show' section of the Unofficial Mills board: -

Scott's off on his holidays again soon!
Pink & Orange & Green & Blue With Scott!!
Leaving gnomes on walls
Lady Ga Ga

Now, what I want to know is - how does what one person posts mean that everyone else on the board doesn't have a life (which is a particularly stupid turn-of-phrase (I'm not going FG there)).

And yes, the topic with double exclamation marks is a Viv topic.

[Cookie]

Leaving Gnomes on Walls is a current mystery in Scott mills' life.

And why does 'Viv' seem to keep being brought back up on here. That topic is crap, but usually she is very good. She wrote very well about Edith Bowman days agoo.

[Yudster]

I agree about the naughty and nice lists.

[Console]

Leaving Gnomes on Walls is a current mystery in Scott mills' life.

And why does 'Viv' seem to keep being brought back up on here. That topic is crap, but usually she is very good. She wrote very well about Edith Bowman days agoo.

When was the last time Viv was mentioned on here? I think it's probably been a couple of months.

By the way, nice for you to admit that there are crap topics on the Mills site, too.

[Cookie]

She was mentioned today by you, Cress4brains. It's boring the way you are obsessed by her, that's all.

I'm going to eat toast. Bye.

[Console]

Ok, I'm certain now - Viv, you're banned - stay away.

[Yudster]

See I did wonder, but it didn't seem articulate enough. I mentioned my suspicions to someone after the opening post - but after that it seemed less like her. But the way she has avoided commenting on any of my replies makes me agree with you.

[Zoot]

Ha!

[Yudster]

Has she gone again then? Boo.

[MK Chris]

Seriously. Could people raise the standards on these boards? It's so boring, monotonous and crap on here. No wonder Chris Moyles gives so many less mentions than Unofficialmills gets.

Long live Unofficialmills.

Has Scott got nothing else to fill the show with?

There's more on the show than comments about unofficialmills. UM write nice things about Scott, which is why Scott responds so well. On here, people just post boring shite, usually copied from unofficialmills.

If we are critical about certain things on the show, it's because we are fans. We like the show to be the best it can be. I believe Chris absolutely understands that and picks on the negative comments rather than the positive because it makes for better radio.

It's been a while since I've mentioned UnofficialMills, but since we've had provocation, if I were Scott Mills, I would much rather have a forum like this one than the sycophantic one on UnofficialMills. But Mills would probably disagree.. let's face it, he surrounds himself with team of sycophants, why should he want his message board to be any different?

I also agree about the 'naughty' and 'nice' topics, but if you look, they have been posted by an occasional (at best) member and not someone who is a regular. What you have done, as Console has indicated, is take a selection of the worst recent topics as an indicator for the general standard of the board - are you a journalist? You certainly seem to have the credentials that could potentially set you in good stead at some of the most loathsome publications around.. try Richard Desmond, his publications are some of the worst. If we take a larger selection of topics - say from the last month - I have a feeling you'll be looking at a lot more shit threads at UnofficialMills than here - and more of them started by regulars too.

One last thing I have to add is as soon as you indicated that you think Viv's topics are normally of a high standard, you just confirmed what a load of bollocks you talk.

[MK Chris]

Bugger... too late.