Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#384342
That's never stopped you in the past.
User avatar
By Munki Bhoy
#384419
Console wrote:The even-numbered films are generally considered to the be the better ones.


More or less. Nemesis is just a rip off of Wrath of Khan and it was movie ten. If you're going to watch a Next Generation one, watch First Contact. Generations is so full of holes it takes me longer to rant about them than it does to watch the movie and Insurrection is childish nonsense half the time.

Admittedly, none of them are as bad as Star Trek V. Or as tedious as The Motion Picture... although it's much better if you watch the director's cut now.

Basically stick with 2, 4, 6 and 8. Throw in 3 as well as it forms a trilogy with 2 and 4.
User avatar
By Uglybob
#384470
red dwarf specials were poor. they felt like a specially recorded episode to be shown on comic relief or something like that.
the dave reference should be cut from the dvd.
series 2-6 are the best. series 1 is a bit of a slog and very dull sets do not help.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#384488
Munki Bhoy wrote:
Console wrote:The even-numbered films are generally considered to the be the better ones.


More or less. Nemesis is just a rip off of Wrath of Khan and it was movie ten. If you're going to watch a Next Generation one, watch First Contact. Generations is so full of holes it takes me longer to rant about them than it does to watch the movie and Insurrection is childish nonsense half the time.

Admittedly, none of them are as bad as Star Trek V. Or as tedious as The Motion Picture... although it's much better if you watch the director's cut now.

Basically stick with 2, 4, 6 and 8. Throw in 3 as well as it forms a trilogy with 2 and 4.


So far I've got Star Trek II & Star Trek VI, I'll probably end up getting all of them anyway if enjoy these two (I'm unfortunately one of those people that can't have "gaps" in a collection or series so I end up getting them all, normally). I think I saw Generations in the cinema as I had a spare Saturday once so me & a mate went and saw it (isn't that the one with Picard & Shatner?) I remember it being a bit dull as I never saw another one after that, to be fair it was the only Star Trek film I've ever seen.

Uglybob wrote:red dwarf specials were poor. they felt like a specially recorded episode to be shown on comic relief or something like that.
the dave reference should be cut from the dvd.
series 2-6 are the best. series 1 is a bit of a slog and very dull sets do not help.


I rather enjoyed the special to be honest. The DVD will have a feature length version so watching it in that format would improve it somewhat. I imagine if they go on to make another series it'll be more like Dwarf of old that in the style of Back To Earth
By methuk
#385371
Sorry jumped in at the end.

I thought that the whole thing was awful. The writing was dire and largely immature, I remember coming up with that sort of thing when I was about 8. Characters visiting the people that actually play them.

I don't think there was a single funny bit. Chris Barrie was terrible, Incredibly stiff. Cat just had no material.

Really shouldn't have happenned. I used to love Red Dwarf and this has just left a sour taste
By Blackbook
#385500
I'm glad they did SOMETHING. a decade had gone by with talk of a film..no film...final series...no final series....I'm glad they put it to bed now.

Red Dwarf...RIP...you were/are amazing and my DVD collection still brings me joy.
By methuk
#385534
Blackbook wrote:I'm glad they did SOMETHING. a decade had gone by with talk of a film..no film...final series...no final series....I'm glad they put it to bed now.

Red Dwarf...RIP...you were/are amazing and my DVD collection still brings me joy.


Your DVD collection brings you joy?

Any Red Dwarf in there? Or just those specialist movies?
By Blackbook
#385561
methuk wrote:
Blackbook wrote:I'm glad they did SOMETHING. a decade had gone by with talk of a film..no film...final series...no final series....I'm glad they put it to bed now.

Red Dwarf...RIP...you were/are amazing and my DVD collection still brings me joy.


Your DVD collection brings you joy?

Any Red Dwarf in there? Or just those specialist movies?


I have lots of Wilma Flintstone.... ;)
User avatar
By Zoot
#385570
Blackbook wrote:
methuk wrote:
Blackbook wrote:I'm glad they did SOMETHING. a decade had gone by with talk of a film..no film...final series...no final series....I'm glad they put it to bed now.

Red Dwarf...RIP...you were/are amazing and my DVD collection still brings me joy.


Your DVD collection brings you joy?

Any Red Dwarf in there? Or just those specialist movies?


I have lots of Wilma Flintstone.... ;)


I'd go with, Betty, but I'd be thinking of Wilma
User avatar
By Latina
#385633
What did everyone make of the lack of canned laughter (or live audience laughter - not sure which it was)? I got used to it, but I admit I missed it quite a lot. I think I would have accepted it better if a) it was feature length or b) the jokes were funnier, as the lack of canned laughter makes bad jokes stick out more.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#385635
Don't know about Red Dwarf, but as a general rule, I agree with Graham Linehan that old-fashioned audience sit-coms are very much missed. There is a place for the mock documentary style, but it's been over done.
User avatar
By Latina
#385639
I agree. That style works for some shows, but I wish it wouldn't be viewed as standard for all comedy programmes that are now made, especially revivals of previous sitcoms.
User avatar
By Yudster
#426033
I miss Latina, where is she these days?
User avatar
By Yudster
#426041
What - really?
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#426164
I miss Red Dwarf.
User avatar
By Yudster
#426210
I miss the point.
User avatar
By Yudster
#426214
Ah, thanks Duck, I missed that.



What?

Sat and today are up

Changes at Radio One

Scott Mills is finally getting a Breakfast Show, a[…]