jk and joel back on radio.

The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
 Forum rules
 Reply

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By ThinkofaNumber
-  Tue May 19, 2009 7:23 pm #387182
I can't stand JK and Joel.

But to Topher, trust me, there is always an appropriate moment to say " OMFG!! " in a particularly camp fashion.

Try it one day. ;)

With regards Ian K, so what if he is lazy anyway, some people are.....is that part of the terms and conditions on here too?
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By freddie
-  Tue May 19, 2009 8:46 pm #387187
txt-ma5t3r wrote:man dia sh!t is unr3al - no1 g!v3s a fudge if it'5 txt speek or w!ll!am f***!ng shak3sp3ar3 - st!ll mak35 s3nse to me yall!!! :D


'Man, this shit is unreal - no-one gives a * if it's in text-speak or if it's William Shakespeare - Still makes sense to me'
Last edited by freddie on Tue May 19, 2009 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By txt-ma5t3r
-  Tue May 19, 2009 8:49 pm #387189
freddie wrote:
txt-ma5t3r wrote:man dia sh!t is unr3al - no1 g!v3s a fudge if it'5 txt speek or w!ll!am f***!ng shak3sp3ar3 - st!ll mak35 s3nse to me yall!!! :D


'Man, this shit is unreal - no-one gives a * if it's in text-speak or if it's William shakespeare - Still makes sense to me'


If one could acknowledge the spelling correction that is "shakespeare" - one would believe it should be with a capital "S" should it not? Tea and crumpets anyone?
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By jocky85
-  Tue May 19, 2009 8:55 pm #387193
txt-ma5t3r wrote:ye m4n - 4 real 8) u get m3


Once I managed to read this - I could only hear it said by Dizzee Rascall
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By S4B
-  Tue May 19, 2009 9:10 pm #387201
Oh for crying out loud! Look, if we are to be infiltrated by the Judge Jules mafia then can we make one thing clear

TEXT SPEAK IS NOT ALLOWED!!!

It states it in the rules of the forum

Please everyone sane on here, if this guy replies in text speak - DO NOT FEED THE TROLL!!!!*


*this means stop replying to him/her!
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By Bonanzoid
-  Tue May 19, 2009 9:24 pm #387205
The funniest thing about txt-ma5t3r is that putting a 5 where an 's' should be and a 3 where an 'e' should be is in no way text speak. It's arguably 1337/leet speak.

0% text, 50% 1337, 100% stupid.
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By Yudster
-  Wed May 20, 2009 8:27 am #387251
txt-ma5t3r wrote:
freddie wrote:
txt-ma5t3r wrote:man dia sh!t is unr3al - no1 g!v3s a fudge if it'5 txt speek or w!ll!am f***!ng shak3sp3ar3 - st!ll mak35 s3nse to me yall!!! :D


'Man, this shit is unreal - no-one gives a * if it's in text-speak or if it's William shakespeare - Still makes sense to me'


If one could acknowledge the spelling correction that is "shakespeare" - one would believe it should be with a capital "S" should it not? Tea and crumpets anyone?

Yes please! But you're fundamentally wrong, many, many people DO give a shit about the needless proliferation of text speak, which is why the owner of this site doesn't allow its use. All that said though, I like the way you make a point, even if I don't agree with the point!
User avatar

Re: jk and joel back on radio.

By Yudster
-  Wed May 20, 2009 8:28 am #387252
ThinkofaNumber wrote:I LOVE DIZZEE RASCAL!! :)

SO DO I!
S4B wrote:ME TOO!!!! WHY ARE WE SHOUTING????

I DON'T KNOW!
 Reply
 Return to “General”
Chris Moyles Radio Archive (Discussion & Request Thread) Part 2

Show is up

READ MORE
VIEW MORE TOPICS