- Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:26 pm
#401329
That's fair enough Foots, although considering it's an "arranged overdraft" it does seem a bit hypocritical that they sign you up with one (Halifax insisted on me having one when I joined them 6 years ago) & are now punishing you with something that is "arranged" with them. Fair enough if you go over that agreed level overdraft but if they agreed to let you use that overdraft then it's a bit shyte imo.
foot-loose wrote:I do kinda agree with what you are saying, the two points are that firstly the banks need to make a profit from current accounts. Up till now, they have been doing it with charging customers who have broken the terms of their contract with the bank. If they are not allowed to do that then they need to make money elsewhere and that means I need to pay more than I am now, therefore I don't want that to happen.
The other point is that there needs to be an enforcable way of stopping people breaking the terms of their agreement. A massive charge is a pretty good way to enforce that. Making the charges significantly less is not going to be as effective so more people will spend money they don't have and worry less about it.
That's fair enough Foots, although considering it's an "arranged overdraft" it does seem a bit hypocritical that they sign you up with one (Halifax insisted on me having one when I joined them 6 years ago) & are now punishing you with something that is "arranged" with them. Fair enough if you go over that agreed level overdraft but if they agreed to let you use that overdraft then it's a bit shyte imo.
Regards, Johnny 1989
The Chris Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:
Ongoing updates in the Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:
New Thread updated Weekly
The Chris Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:
Ongoing updates in the Moyles and Mark & Lard Archive:
New Thread updated Weekly