chrysostom wrote:so giving more money to everyone helps?
ever thought that the top earners deserve their massive wage?
also you neatly avoided the main point - if a person started a business that somehow turned over more then 200k in a year, they would have to stop their business. it's simply not faesable in the slightest.
I don't see how it doesn't in my example.
Not for a minute do I think Chris is worth more than 200k a year, but 200 was only an arbitrary number. Consider for a moment (if i've got my sums wrong shoot me) a person on minimum wage, working 24 hours a day for 80 years would only make a bit over £4 million. I'm just an advocate of some sort of parity.
And I didn't mean to avoid the point, I first asked for clarification and then attempted to answer what I thought you meant. If a sole-trader is fortunate to start a business that turns enough of a profit to enable him to pay a 200k salary thats good. If the firm earns enough to pay the owner a 300k salary I suggest he not be allowed to pay that extra 100k to himself. That he employ someone else or reinvesting in the firm etc. There always be around the 200k cap with company perks, or putting loved ones on the payroll etc but i've literally only put a few minutes thought into.
As a suggestion to the people who apparently actually manage to live off 10k a year, maybe write a book on how you manage it. Or sell your story to someone who could write about it. I'm just as suprised as Chris if not more, and I want to know how you manage it. You might also be able to make some money spreading your knowledge.