chrysostom wrote:Wykey wrote:Anyone could fill in, to be fair. There's not a lot of hard hitting journalistic insight in the sports bulletins, is there?
I'd say reading the headlines from a couple of red tops and the odd broadsheet to give it a kick would do the job.
you'd be suprised - as there's a fixed amount of time to get all the news stories in, each story needs to run for a specific time - this then boils down to a specific amount of words (with about 90 words per minute being the average) and in this limited frame, all the important information has to be captured, and put across [fairly] impartially - while choosing the appropriate audio clips. on top of all this, the reader has to have a decent knowledge of a variety of sporting activity - and also make the decisions what is worthy of a place in the bulletin. writing sport (and news) for radio broadcast is a lot more difficult than it seems.
Then why does it always seem like she's reading a story that she's been presented with for the first time?
I like Carrie's personality and she seems like a nice lady, but she's no sports journalist.
I'd expect a sports journalist to know the difference between a home run and a run in baseball, for example. I don't expect her to know the intricacies of at bats, hits, inside the park home runs and outside the park home runs, but an understanding of what she's reporting would be nice.
I wouldn't expect them to know that Teofilio Cubillas scored one of the best free-kicks in the 1978 world cup, but I'd expect them to know when away goals count in European football.
I'd expect them to know the difference between wides and byes in cricket.
Carrie doesn't, and for me it means she's not a proper sports journo. It's not really important in the scheme of things, it's just small details, but that's what makes me think it's more of a presentation skill than knowledge / research skill.