The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
#404421
DevilsDuck wrote:I can't see how this compares to SachsGate. But someone is going to get in trouble at the beeb......


I don't see why anyone at the Beeb should get in trouble, if anything the only one that needs to get in trouble is that useless twunt Dappy for breaching Moyles & co's trust. The BBC shouldn't have any fingers pointed at them because they aren't responsible if someone acts like an arse

EDIT: What I can see however is NDubz getting a lifetime ban from Radio 1, at least that's one good thing to come out of this ;)
#404422
Johnny 1989 wrote:
DevilsDuck wrote:I can't see how this compares to SachsGate. But someone is going to get in trouble at the beeb......


I don't see why anyone at the Beeb should get in trouble, if anything the only one that needs to get in trouble is that useless twunt Dappy for breaching Moyles & co's trust. The BBC shouldn't have any fingers pointed at them because they aren't responsible if someone acts like an arse


Agreed!

Although I must admit the whole thing reminded me of the classic Alan Partridge scene.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvsfCMPkTl4

"It's your show, you're responsible for the output. I am technically a guest and you failed to control me."

:D
#404423
This is an awful situation I mean here is this poor girl texting into a radio show and one of the guests, who should expect to be criticized from time to time, takes her number and begins to send her threatening text messages.

I mean she was so upset over this she went straight to the ....eh.... Sun news paper to ?!?! :?

I wonder how longer before the Daily Mail blame Chris for this or any newspaper for that matter
Last edited by Mugs on Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#404424
English Bob wrote:
Johnny 1989 wrote:
DevilsDuck wrote:I can't see how this compares to SachsGate. But someone is going to get in trouble at the beeb......


I don't see why anyone at the Beeb should get in trouble, if anything the only one that needs to get in trouble is that useless twunt Dappy for breaching Moyles & co's trust. The BBC shouldn't have any fingers pointed at them because they aren't responsible if someone acts like an arse


Agreed!

Although I must admit the whole thing reminded me of the classic Alan Partridge scene.....http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvsfCMPkTl4

"It's your show, you're responsible for the output. I am technically a guest and you failed to control me."

:D


:lol: That's funny, but careful you don't give the Mail ideas though Bob ;)
#404425
Mugs wrote:This is an awful situation I mean here is this poor girl texting into a radio show and one of the guests, who should expect to be criticized from time to time, takes her number and begins to send her threatening text messages.

I mean she was so upset over this she went straight to the ....eh.... Sun news paper to ?!?! :?

I wonder how longer before the Daily Mail blame Chris for this or any newspaper for that matter


Well they had to mention Chris & the Auschwitz joke in their article, which I always fine ironic that the Heil criticize him for that :lol:
#404426
I'd have thought it was a breach of the data protection act, which someone would be responsible for ensuring is adhered to on behalf of the BBC?
#404428
Topher wrote:I'd have thought it was a breach of the data protection act, which someone would be responsible for ensuring is adhered to on behalf of the BBC?

thats what I was thinking!
#404429
Topher wrote:I'd have thought it was a breach of the data protection act, which someone would be responsible for ensuring is adhered to on behalf of the BBC?


I'm sure the BBC does adhere to it Topher, the point is though that they weren't to know that that little twerp would go out of his way to get this number & act like a * (no need to sugar coat it, he has been a complete *). He's behaved incorrectly, not the BBC.
#404430
Yes, but isn't the point that he shouldn't have had the opportunity to take the number down at all, which it sounds like they normally do by turning the text screen off when guests are in?
#404431
Johnny 1989 wrote:I'm sure the BBC does adhere to it Topher, the point is though that they weren't to know that that little twerp would go out of his way to get this number & act like a * (no need to sugar coat it, he has been a complete *). He's behaved incorrectly, not the BBC.


But leaving information unsecure is a breach of DPA...editorial policy/management (I assume) will being having a 'chat' with whoever is responsible.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/editori ... iona.shtml
#404433
Fair enough, I just hope that no one on the Moyles team gets told off too badly, after all it was a mistake & they weren't to know that this twerp was going to do this. In the last 12-14 years Moyles has worked at the BBC shite like this never happend.
#404436
nicola_red wrote:It shows Dappy up for what he really is, and hopefully it might stop Chris fawning all over N-Dubz quite as much.


We live in hope...

Isn't it ironic that on one of the few occasions that a guest can see the text screen this happens. What a mistaka to maka...
#404438
I think its just disgusting. This man has been invited onto a radio show and takes advantage of it by putting down the phone number of someone who sent a not even very offensive text and texts her back with a death threat after he has been placed with the responsibiility of convinving children and teenagers not to do just that. In reply to what was said earlier in the thread I would love to see him prosecuted but because he's a celebrity it just won't happen. It's disgraceful.

and breathe John...
#404442
hopefully it might stop Chris fawning all over N-Dubz quite as much


Very true, dear old dappy has gone well down in my estimation. In hindsight what a stupid move it was, they have practically kissed good bye to an advertisng vehicle that any musician would give their hen teeth to appear on regularly....access to a 7+million audience without spending a penny on marketing is about as good as it gets!
#404443
Never seen what all the fuss was about with ndubz or whatever they're called.
You've only got to look at his stupid bloody hat to see he's a nob.

If he's going to act like a nob on the radio, he should be prepared to be called a nob.
What a "gangsta man", theatening a Woman.

What a nob.

CM
#404462
They have always surprised me when they've been on the show by being so likeable and articulate and apparently great, but then I heard about some of the stuff they've got up to in the past - and I preferred to think that what I weas hearing was real, and what I was reading was fabricated. Clearly the wrong way to go there. My previously positive opinion of Dappy and co has gone right through the floor, to the extent that I fully agree with what the woman who sent the text to the show said. And Dappy, if you're reading this - come and have a go if you think you're hard enough, you stupid, deluded, pathetic, moronic, gormless and truly pointless loser.

I kind of hope he does read it actually.......what a tool.
#404531
I doubt they'll ever talk on the show about what he did (the BBC have probably told them not to).

Personally, I'd lose a lot of respect for Chris if they ever appear on his show again.
He can't condone that Dappy sending death threats to someone, and letting them appear on the show again would suggest that he does.

I think the show will be a lot better off without having to listen to those idiots again.
I don't listen to any other radio shows, so I could do without those nobs appearing on it.

CM
#404533
ChunkyMunky wrote:I doubt they'll ever talk on the show about what he did (the BBC have probably told them not to).


That's probably right. There's been no mention yet and they would have done so by now, most likely when Chris was going through the tabloids in the opening link.

There was however a notable absence of a mention when they were talking about go karting (this time with JLS). N-Dubs also didn't feature on the current podcast trailer, although I don't remember if they ever did.
#404574
ChunkyMunky wrote:I doubt they'll ever talk on the show about what he did (the BBC have probably told them not to).


It was mentioned today, albeit briefly in a passing reference.

I'll post a listen again time for it when I get the chance