Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Zoot
#405148
Apparently he finally got banned, is this correct? What was the last straw?
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#405149
Haven't a clue myself although if he did I imagine it's his use of the term p**i that got him banned?
User avatar
By Yudster
#405154
What for? What did he do? Who did he do? Who complained (not that I think that's a difficult question to answer)? If its true, shame.
User avatar
By Zoot
#405156
Yudster wrote:What for? What did he do? Who did he do? Who complained (not that I think that's a difficult question to answer)? If its true, shame.


Well i had a message from Beadle on Xbox live saying he had finally been banned and it had surprised him that it had only taken 3 years.
User avatar
By Yudster
#405157
Well I think he's a tit of the first order, but I don't like banning. Its only a messageboard, people shouldn't take it so personally.
User avatar
By John22
#405162
Yudster wrote:not that I think that's a difficult question to answer

I don't know if you were referring to me, but if so, no it wasn't.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#405164
No, she wasn't referring to you.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#405166
Yudster wrote:Well I think he's a tit of the first order, but I don't like banning. Its only a messageboard, people shouldn't take it so personally.


I agree with you Yuds, I was only guessing it was due to him using that word.

The only ones I think should be banned are spambots but then again everyone does :)
User avatar
By Yudster
#405173
John22 wrote:
Yudster wrote:not that I think that's a difficult question to answer

I don't know if you were referring to me, but if so, no it wasn't.

No, bearing in mind the flouncing, I was assuming it was English Bob.
User avatar
By Console
#405178
Johnny 1989 wrote:The only ones I think should be banned are spambots but then again everyone does :)


I doubt the spammers would agree. Talking of spammers, you don't think they should be banned too?
User avatar
By English Bob
#405180
Zoot wrote:Apparently he finally got banned, is this correct? What was the last straw?


I posted a heartfelt post in a topic on assisted suicide about a dead relative, Beadle shat all over it. He went too far, simple.

Yes, it was me who reported Beadle. Do I regret it? Nope. As for the people (mainly Yudster) who say "It's only an internet messageboard, what does it have to do with real life?" well frankly you just hold a strange view. There isn't a real person sitting behind a keyboard on the internet then? Everyone who uses the internet is an emotionless robot? Well in Yudster's case, maybe, but not everyone is.

Why am I having to justify myself for having feelings? Madness.....

Image

And you wonder why chrismoyles.net has trouble keeping newbies interested for long?
User avatar
By DevilsDuck
#405181
English Bob wrote:And you wonder why chrismoyles.net has trouble keeping newbies interested for long?


I think the majority of regulars just dont take anything seriously as its the internet and the law is to give as good as you get.....or give it out first.

Some people dont get that and beadle may have taken it to the extreme.....he was a tit!
User avatar
By foot-loose
#405182
DevilsDuck wrote:
English Bob wrote:And you wonder why chrismoyles.net has trouble keeping newbies interested for long?


I think the majority of regulars just dont take anything seriously as its the internet and the law is to give as good as you get.....or give it out first.

You're a wanker. 8)
User avatar
By DevilsDuck
#405184
foot-loose wrote:
DevilsDuck wrote:
English Bob wrote:And you wonder why chrismoyles.net has trouble keeping newbies interested for long?


I think the majority of regulars just dont take anything seriously as its the internet and the law is to give as good as you get.....or give it out first.

You're a wanker. 8)


:cry:

You're a hetro!
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#405185
Console wrote:
Johnny 1989 wrote:The only ones I think should be banned are spambots but then again everyone does :)


I doubt the spammers would agree. Talking of spammers, you don't think they should be banned too?


I suppose it depends, if they keep opening threads with dodgy links, then yeah they should really.

By the way unless I'm misreading that wrong, are you referring to myself as a spammer? :)
User avatar
By freddie
#405186
English Bob wrote:
Zoot wrote:Apparently he finally got banned, is this correct? What was the last straw?


I posted a heartfelt post in a topic on assisted suicide about a dead relative, Beadle shat all over it. He went too far, simple.

Yes, it was me who reported Beadle. Do I regret it? Nope. As for the people (mainly Yudster) who say "It's only an internet messageboard, what does it have to do with real life?" well frankly you just hold a strange view. There isn't a real person sitting behind a keyboard on the internet then? Everyone who uses the internet is an emotionless robot? Well in Yudster's case, maybe, but not everyone is.

Why am I having to justify myself for having feelings? Madness.....

Image

And you wonder why chrismoyles.net has trouble keeping newbies interested for long?


Beadle did cross the mark - there simply was no need to make a comment like he did.

A topic like Assisted Suicide needs to be treated with respect, and it simply wasnt. I'm sure Beadle would not be happy if we posted something along those lines.

Why did he use Beadle as his identity? I'm sure he is dead
User avatar
By Console
#405190
Johnny 1989 wrote:By the way unless I'm misreading that wrong, are you referring to myself as a spammer?


No, I referring to the people behind spambots as spammers.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#405191
Console wrote:
Johnny 1989 wrote:By the way unless I'm misreading that wrong, are you referring to myself as a spammer?


No, I referring to the people behind spambots as spammers.


Ah ok I understand now, I though I had misunderstood you earlier :)

As long as they don't interfere with this forum then they can do what they want.
User avatar
By Yudster
#405193
English Bob wrote:As for the people (mainly Yudster) who say "It's only an internet messageboard, what does it have to do with real life?" well frankly you just hold a strange view. There isn't a real person sitting behind a keyboard on the internet then? Everyone who uses the internet is an emotionless robot? Well in Yudster's case, maybe, but not everyone is.

Why am I having to justify myself for having feelings? Madness.....

The only person who is compelling you to justify anything you have said or done is yourself, I'm sure neither I nor anyone else here really cares - why would we, we don't know you and never will.

And yes, it IS just the internet - by which I mean its not compulsory to be here is it? Its not your workplace, or your school, or your home, where you can't get out if you don't like it. Its an anonymous, (mostly) faceless limbo where none of us has any basis on which to assume that anyone else is who or what they seem, so why treat it like something real?

None of us are forced to post personal information or news on here, so if we do we should be prepared for the responses of whoever happens to see it - whether they are people we like and approve of or not. Some time ago someone posted some really nasty comments which were aimed at my then four year old son. I'm certainly not going to pretend that I enjoyed that, but although this person was banned, it wasn't me that complained - it just reminded me that if I talk about my family on here, I have no control over who sees that, or who comments.

If you don't like getting wet, don't go to the swimming pool. If you don't like being exposed to people that you really think (probably rightly) are arseholes, don't go on the internet.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#405195
I think cos most people are mostly fairly pleasant on this forum it lulls people into a bit of a false sense of security. I cut my messageboard teeth on metalsludge - a ferocious environment where I was followed all over the board and called fat and STD-ridden by a couple of guys I'd done nothing to. In fact one of the longest-standing, best-known posters on there died tragically of heart failure a couple days ago, but most people didn't dare post anything about his death cos it was inevitable it would attract nasty, hateful comments from his so-called 'enemies'. You develop a thick skin pretty quickly in a place like that, and Beadle wouldn't have lasted 5mins against some of the posters on there.
User avatar
By Munki Bhoy
#405200
English Bob wrote:Yes, it was me who reported Beadle. Do I regret it? Nope. As for the people (mainly Yudster) who say "It's only an internet messageboard, what does it have to do with real life?" well frankly you just hold a strange view. There isn't a real person sitting behind a keyboard on the internet then? Everyone who uses the internet is an emotionless robot? Well in Yudster's case, maybe, but not everyone is.


On other forums they're known as "Keyboard Warriors". Usually socially inept people who use forums, chatrooms and other internet based communications to vent in the same way you might see arguments in the pub, on the street, or wherever. These people generally aren't outgoing enough to be able to do such things in a confrontational manner, but are perfectly able to do it from the relative safety of the other end of a broadband line.

I know, I've been accused of being a keyboard warrior many times. It's probably true to a certain extent, although my mouth has got me into trouble many times in the past!
User avatar
By Boboff
#405205
Console Moderates.

Beadle was at the edge of reason and always trying to get a rise from people, if he went to far and was warned, and he ignored the warning, then really it's his fault. Any "society" has to have rules, and if you can't live with the rules then you can't be a part of it.

On the above basis ( i.e. he was warned) and that generally moderation on this site is relaxed, and Console couldn't give a flying * what any of us think, I am in agreement with the banning.
User avatar
By Yudster
#405230
boboff wrote:Console Moderates.

Beadle was at the edge of reason and always trying to get a rise from people, if he went to far and was warned, and he ignored the warning, then really it's his fault. Any "society" has to have rules, and if you can't live with the rules then you can't be a part of it.

On the above basis ( i.e. he was warned) and that generally moderation on this site is relaxed, and Console couldn't give a flying * what any of us think, I am in agreement with the banning.

All true of course. Its the principle that I don't agree with, but I certainly don't advocate anarchy here or anywhere else - just because I don't like a rule doesn't mean I am going to assume it doesn't have to apply.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#405246
Coo, RIP BP.

He won't be broken, his posts were entirely aimed at getting a rise from people, he'll be pleased to have achieved it.

I'm pretty sure face to face in real life his views would differ, but given the format that this is, a certain ammount of faceless anonimity is available to us.

I agree with Yuds, who is a wise lady. You don't want to hear the opinions of others, no matter how personal or otherwise, look elsewhere! Or, keep yourself to yourself to the point that no one can make a personal attack as they no nothing of you. No one HAS to like you, or be nice to you.

I'm sure some of the more regular members here could recall a few minor details of who I actually am. Do i live my life based on feedback and approval from people here? * off!

I'm not supporting bad taste comments, but given that everyone has different tollerance levels, you can only post your thoughts and view the musings of others. You will not change them with a retort of any kind.

Sat and today are up