[newsbeat]

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/mult...80_162664a.jpg
RADIO 1 meltdown man Chris Moyles came face- to-face with his ex-girlfriend yesterday for the first time since their shock split.

They couldn't avoid each other as they both attended a mutual friend's wedding in York. The loudmouth DJ, 36, seems on the edge after dumping BBC producer Sophie Waite because he didn't want to marry her.
The stress of the split and contract wrangles with the Beeb, which left him unpaid, led to a half-hour moan live on air last week from the roly-poly grump. But the News of the World understands the BBC will NOT take any disciplinary action because they are too worried about his state of mind.
A friend said: "Chris and Sophie are both devastated about the split."



http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/show...t-wedding.html

[ededwards]

The links are broken in that last post, think these are the full links you wanted:

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/multime ... 62664a.jpg
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz ... dding.html

I could be wrong, but is that even Sophie in that picture though? Doesn't look like her.

[Travis Bickle]

That either isnt Sophie or it is a picture taken at such an angle that it has totally and utterly altered the image of her face!

[DevilsDuck]

I love it when they use phrases such as "roly-poly"

[ania]

That is not Sophie! What makes it worse is that the paparazzi gate crashed the wedding for such a non-story. I'm sure that Chris nor the happy couple wouldn't have wished for that.

[neilt0]

OK, so the title of this post is wrong and the story is completely wrong. Great stuff!

[bmstinton93]

Definitely not Sophie! Not a chance! Unless this split has affected her so much that she has decided to have a facelift. * News Of The World. No one usually cares about Chris Moyles I don't even see him as that much of a celebrity tbh as he just keeps out of the limelight and journalists tend not to care about radio shows I didn't think.

[newsbeat]

Didn't think it was her, compare these pictures with the ones in the article about the split, she does look different

[DannyBoy]

Daily Fail have it all wrong also
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ds-newsxml

they even have real Sophie's picture up on the page along with the pictures of the other lady who they are saying is Sophie.

[Emmy]

I've just seen that too. How can the person putting up the article not notice?!

[Sarah_lou]

his sister in law has tweeted

Shouldn't have worried about that Mail pap the other day - seems they have no idea who they're taking pictures of anyway! Idiots.

[shamrock student]

Guys and Gals, I've deliberately avoided commenting on this topic until now for some of these reasons . Call me old fashioned but is discussing the private life of Chris here on the same moral ground as some of the newspapers mentioned above. This and the Sophie thread might as well be combined and named "Friends and family of Chris...discuss". Even directing traffic to the websites of those newspapers is just helping them get more revenue from online ad sales. As for tweets from sisters in law...just leave it

From my point of view anything discussed on air is fair game here, like the whole pay rant or on air guests for example. But discussing people in the private life of Chris and topics which he hasent brought to the airwaves, in a public forum like this is not much better than some of the half assed articles in national newspapers. It all leaves a online record and I'm sure can be easily accessed through Google if any of the parties ever decide to read up on the topic.

We all go through rough times in our lives, and I'd hate to think that some of the waffle here could potentially cause the same intrusion to Chris as paps following him around central London. He is human too. If Chris decides to talk on this subject for half an hour in the morning then I'd see no problem discussing it, but until then give the big guy some breathing space.

Just my two cents, Shamrock-over and out!

[DannyBoy]

I've just seen that too. How can the person putting up the article not notice?!

I guess they just want sell papers, they are unbelievable the crap they get away with and the spin they put on stories to create controversy, Daily Mail looks to have removed the comments that were posted earlier by people saying the pictures don't match and that the wedding picture of the lady is not Sophie.

[foot-loose]

Guys and Gals, I've deliberately avoided commenting on this topic until now for some of these reasons . Call me old fashioned but is discussing the private life of Chris here on the same moral ground as some of the newspapers mentioned above. This and the Sophie thread might as well be combined and named "Friends and family of Chris...discuss". Even directing traffic to the websites of those newspapers is just helping them get more revenue from online ad sales. As for tweets from sisters in law...just leave it

From my point of view anything discussed on air is fair game here, like the whole pay rant or on air guests for example. But discussing people in the private life of Chris and topics which he hasent brought to the airwaves, in a public forum like this is not much better than some of the half assed articles in national newspapers. It all leaves a online record and I'm sure can be easily accessed through Google if any of the parties ever decide to read up on the topic.

We all go through rough times in our lives, and I'd hate to think that some of the waffle here could potentially cause the same intrusion to Chris as paps following him around central London. He is human too. If Chris decides to talk on this subject for half an hour in the morning then I'd see no problem discussing it, but until then give the big guy some breathing space.

Just my two cents, Shamrock-over and out!

Seconded.

[newsbeat]

Thirded. He needs to be left alone

[Emmy]

Being someone who likes a bit of celebrity gossip, and who will willingly admit to not being the most empathetic person around, I disagree.

Chris frequently spoke about Sophie on air when all was going well, so he did put her and their relationship in the public domain. If he had never spoken about her then I would completely agree with you that it shouldn't be commented upon.

I can't think why anyone involved would bother to google their own break-up, and if they did choose to do so then I'm sure they'd be well aware what kind of stuff they'd find.

I do agree about posting tweets from his sister-in-law however, that seems to be going into slightly stalkerish territory.

[Ilovematt]

Guys and Gals, I've deliberately avoided commenting on this topic until now for some of these reasons . Call me old fashioned but is discussing the private life of Chris here on the same moral ground as some of the newspapers mentioned above. This and the Sophie thread might as well be combined and named "Friends and family of Chris...discuss". Even directing traffic to the websites of those newspapers is just helping them get more revenue from online ad sales. As for tweets from sisters in law...just leave it

From my point of view anything discussed on air is fair game here, like the whole pay rant or on air guests for example. But discussing people in the private life of Chris and topics which he hasent brought to the airwaves, in a public forum like this is not much better than some of the half assed articles in national newspapers. It all leaves a online record and I'm sure can be easily accessed through Google if any of the parties ever decide to read up on the topic.

We all go through rough times in our lives, and I'd hate to think that some of the waffle here could potentially cause the same intrusion to Chris as paps following him around central London. He is human too. If Chris decides to talk on this subject for half an hour in the morning then I'd see no problem discussing it, but until then give the big guy some breathing space.

Just my two cents, Shamrock-over and out!

I totally agree with you Shamrock.

This is none of our business. I am gutted that they have split and find threads on here about it, unnecessary.

[Emmy]

The Daily Mail have taken down the story now, they must have finally spotted their blatantly obvious mistake. The NOTW have yet to pull their story, and only one commenter on it has pointed out that it's not Sophie in the photo.

[Travis Bickle]

Guys and Gals, I've deliberately avoided commenting on this topic until now for some of these reasons . Call me old fashioned but is discussing the private life of Chris here on the same moral ground as some of the newspapers mentioned above. This and the Sophie thread might as well be combined and named "Friends and family of Chris...discuss". Even directing traffic to the websites of those newspapers is just helping them get more revenue from online ad sales. As for tweets from sisters in law...just leave it

From my point of view anything discussed on air is fair game here, like the whole pay rant or on air guests for example. But discussing people in the private life of Chris and topics which he hasent brought to the airwaves, in a public forum like this is not much better than some of the half assed articles in national newspapers. It all leaves a online record and I'm sure can be easily accessed through Google if any of the parties ever decide to read up on the topic.

We all go through rough times in our lives, and I'd hate to think that some of the waffle here could potentially cause the same intrusion to Chris as paps following him around central London. He is human too. If Chris decides to talk on this subject for half an hour in the morning then I'd see no problem discussing it, but until then give the big guy some breathing space.

Just my two cents, Shamrock-over and out!

I dont agree. We are within our rights to comment, and as a whole I dont think we have overstepped the mark. I think this thread has been fine.

[bmstinton93]

I think Chris would be perfectly fine with the comments on here as a whole.

[arabd]

Thirded. He needs to be left alone

Erm ...... Was it not you who started this thread?

[DannyBoy]

Being someone who likes a bit of celebrity gossip, and who will willingly admit to not being the most empathetic person around, I disagree.

Chris frequently spoke about Sophie on air when all was going well, so he did put her and their relationship in the public domain. If he had never spoken about her then I would completely agree with you that it shouldn't be commented upon.

I can't think why anyone involved would bother to google their own break-up, and if they did choose to do so then I'm sure they'd be well aware what kind of stuff they'd find.

I do agree about posting tweets from his sister-in-law however, that seems to be going into slightly stalkerish territory.

I dont agree. We are within our rights to comment, and as a whole I dont think we have overstepped the mark. I think this thread has been fine.

Agree with you both 100%.

[corsaboi]

I think it's ok to comment on the media coverage of the whole breakup, cos some of it needs highlighting how awful it is. Can't ignore it.

I draw the line at discussing whether they should have broken up or not, or were they right for each other etc. That's just * wrong.

[Travis Bickle]

Thirded. He needs to be left alone

Erm ...... Was it not you who started this thread?

Get out of that one, newsbeat.

[newsbeat]

Thirded. He needs to be left alone

Erm ...... Was it not you who started this thread?

Well yes, but I then changed my mind