Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467681
If you're even considering the possibility that you'll be the child's father in a practical sense, then you're 100% involved. It's hard for me to give any sort of unbiased opinion as I find the whole concept of having children, even those that are not biologically mine, somewhat terrifying. If I were in this situation I'd have broken it off as soon as I found out - which may well be a selfish option, but sometimes you have to be selfish for your own wellbeing.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#467683
My tuppence worth is that it is only right and proper and fair to TELL the lad who his dad is as soon as she feels he is old enough to understand, then he can make his own decision on whether he wants to try and meet up with him or not. Just my opinion, but try to put yourself in his shoes - I know I would want to know, even if in all likelihood I would still consider the boyfriend to be my dad, I would still want to know where I had come from so to speak.
By bmstinton93
#467686
Oh I know. Its not gonna be for a good few years yet anyway but obviously its a massive thing and you just need to handle it carefully. We hopefully won't have to cross that for a while though.

Weirdly though, I have her ex on facebook and he must have seen all my posts this morning and he hasn't like kicked off or anything so he obviously doesn't give a crap.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#467687
He may not have done - I miss loads because I'm not on Facebook much. Also why on earth do you have him on there? Are you friends with him?
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467688
Topher wrote:My tuppence worth is that it is only right and proper and fair to TELL the lad who his dad is as soon as she feels he is old enough to understand, then he can make his own decision on whether he wants to try and meet up with him or not. Just my opinion, but try to put yourself in his shoes - I know I would want to know, even if in all likelihood I would still consider the boyfriend to be my dad, I would still want to know where I had come from so to speak.


I agree 100% with this too.
By bmstinton93
#467689
Erm... I added him just so we could check up on him cause Katie has now blocked him out her life and then I was messaging him on her behalf just saying about how he needs to either make the effort or leave her alone. We haven't done anything petty but she doesn't wanna be seeing updates on his facebook so at least if anything does happen that she needs to know about then I can tell her then so it won't affect her as much.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467690
She managed to make a baby with him but can't send him messages on facebook?
By bmstinton93
#467691
She's already done all that countless times and all he ever did was just constantly break promises so she decided to tell him he's had his chances and then just block him out her life and see if he reacts. It was all just getting too much for her.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467692
That's fair enough. But I don't get why you would just then send him messages instead. Either do it or don't do it.
By bmstinton93
#467693
Tbh it probably wasn't a good idea. Part of me just wanted to prove to myself that I was supporting her and being involved in helping her that way. And also partly to show him that she personally doesn't need any support from him.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467694
I understand, but I feel you may have achieved the opposite. If he's a horrible person he'll have taken it to mean that she does need him after all and is just getting someone else to do her dirty work. If he's just a terrified kid he'll have taken it to mean that someone else has stepped up to the responsibilities so he can feel better about not doing.
By bmstinton93
#467695
Gotta admit its probably more the 2nd one.

* it, here's the messages:

"Hey, Please can you stop messing Katie around please? She has given you plenty of chances to be involved in your child’s life and you’ve decided not to take them. She doesn’t need you and has all the support she needs right now. If you really wanted to be involved then you would have attended either the 24 week or 34 week scan and you chose not to so as far as her and her family are considered that child no longer has a Dad.


I am going to her scan on wednesday


She doesn't want you there. She gave you the chance to turn up to the last one and you never did so I ended up going with her instead. She wants nothing to do with you. I'm going with her on Wednesday and travelling 60 miles to do so.


I had a exam last time


Maybe you should have told her that one then instead of using lots of excuses now. She still doesn't want you there.


we will see


Yeah we saw."
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467697
So he expressed an interest in being involved and you told him not to? Even if it took him that long to figure out he had a responsibility to the child, shouldn't he have been given the opportunity to step up?

(I'll repeat again that I have no experience in this and I'm only offering my opinions!)
By bmstinton93
#467698
Well we 100% knew that he wouldn't anyway. Besides, if you really wanted to be involved and go to your baby's scan why the hell would you listen to what the mother of your child's new boyfriend says. If you wanna get involved and prove you could be a good dad then surely you fight all that? And he never did. And he had also said he was going to go to the previous 2 scans and never showed up. You can only give a certain amount of chances really.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467699
Yeah, maybe. I dunno, I'm just trying to play devil's advocate. Like I say, it's very difficult to imagine myself in this situation from any side, as I would never get involved with anyone with kids, and the likelihood of me ever being pregnant is, well, less than 0.5%.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467703
Ha! That was not my intention. I suppose if someone managed to knock me up there would be a small part of me that couldn't help but be impressed. But only a very small part.
User avatar
By Yudster
#467712
As far as the biological father is concerned, whether he wants to be involved or whether Katie WANTS him involved are secondary to the fact that he is RESPONSIBLE. Therefore involved or not, he should be required to provide support, if only financial.
User avatar
By The Deadly
#467713
I have really strong semen. I managed to successfully beat the pill!
By bmstinton93
#467714
Yudster wrote:As far as the biological father is concerned, whether he wants to be involved or whether Katie WANTS him involved are secondary to the fact that he is RESPONSIBLE. Therefore involved or not, he should be required to provide support, if only financial.

he won't have many finances anyway and she knows she will cope far better without him walking in and out of his life. I'm not quite sure what point you're trying to make there really. :/
User avatar
By Yudster
#467715
I wasn't really making a point as regards your situation Ben. Its something I strongly believe, in a general sense, but I know that it isn't a "one size fits all" application. Katie obviously needs to do whatever she feels is best with regard to this man - but if he wants to be involved in his child's life and upbringing he has every right to insist on it so shutting him out completely might be more tricky that you both realise. I hope it doesn't come to that.
By bmstinton93
#467716
Tbh I know it's a simple view but as I look at it if he wants involvement enough now he'll take her to court. If he does that then I can't see any of us fighting to him as thats a big enough statement to show you want involvement. But then on the other hand if he doesn't take her to court or try anything like that then he obviously doesn't care enough. That's a very simple way of looking at things but there seems to be some sense in that thinking for me right now.
User avatar
By Yudster
#467718
I think you're right not to want to complicate things any more than they are.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#467723
Deadly wrote:I have really strong semen. I managed to successfully beat the pill!


The pill is 99% effective when taken correctly, so that's pretty good work.
User avatar
By Yudster
#467726
Its the "when taken correctly" you need to be aware of. I would be prepared to bet that in almost all if not all cases where women on the pill have become pregnant, they haven't taken it correctly or used additional contraception when indicated (ie if they have certain illnesses which reduce the effectiveness of the pill). Don't care how strong your lads are Deadly, if there's no egg there to fertilise they're as useless as the ones that swim backwards.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 9

Show is up, and platinum: https://archive.org/dow[…]

Changes at Radio One

Scott Mills is finally getting a Breakfast Show, a[…]