After some thought, it seems that this advert has been tailor made for Chris - and would explain the lack of official communication about where is next for Chris. If this is a result of BBC Commissioning, then legally there will be a due process required when it comes to filling this position (involving advertising this role publicly for a minimum of 2 weeks) - as a result of this process, it's very likely that the parties involved will have to accept a range of applications and will not be able to openly favour any candidate over others, without disclosing who is under consideration. Ben Cooper has already said that Chris would get the chance to reinvent himself in a new role and surprise people.
Picking apart the article:
Radio Today wrote:BBC Commissioning has released tender details of the new all-local radio evening programme, which is set to start on January 7th 2013.
Chris has mentioned a few times on air and on the podcast about 'taking a break'. A 3 month absence would coincide with this.
Radio Today wrote:Applications are invited from all independent production companies who can clearly demonstrate relevant experience and expertise, the BBC says.
Chris would easily fit this criteria, with few others able to compare, meaning if Chris was hired then there would be no grounds for accusations of favouritism or making it impossible for anyone else to get the job - with the best applicant being chosen.
Radio Today wrote:All offers should reach them by 12 noon on August 23rd 2012, with decisions made by September 14th. The winning proposal will then just over three months to arrange the new show.
Chris & the team depart for holiday on the 13th (which is also when public advertising could stop, on the assumption that the advertising has started this week) and return from holiday on the 27th of August, giving Chris (and others?) time to put together a good formal proposal for the show.
If he's chosen then it could be announced in the final week of the show (any time between the 14th - 21st September)
Radio Today wrote:The contract on offer will be for an initial 12 month period, with an option to extend by up to a further 24 months by mutual agreement and will be worth around £150,000.
edit. It seems that the £150k will only be to cover production costs. The presenter costs don't need to be factored in.
Radio Today wrote:The presenter or presenters will be paid separately by the BBC.
Opening the door for the presenter(s?) to remain freelance, as Chris (and Dave) have favoured for a while now.
Radio today wrote:It will reach 17.4 per cent of adults (7.3m), the majority of which is over 50 years old.
This is the one giant fly in the ointment that I can't get round...unless this is going to be the 'target demographic' loophole for allowing Chris to play the type of music that he wants - from the '80s onward? (the target age group was always the reason the golden hour never went that far back). Given that the music won't be the driving force for this show, it would make sense that the presenter play what they like.
But with little evidence of any other major shift in how BBC radio is put together in the near future - this seems quite likely at the moment. Maybe I'm just clutching at straws. There are probably a few inaccuracies in the post, apologies!
edit.
this document which is the 'tender document' has a LOT more detail about the show, and it sounds like it would suit Chris perfectly
Tender Document wrote:The independent production company will demonstrate:
• Evidence of considerable experience in speech radio production.
• A detailed understanding of local radio audience wants, needs and
priorities.
• An ability to understand the complexity of BBC LR as a whole and its
remit within the wider BBC radio portfolio.
• An understanding of the importance of multimedia content in modern
radio and the ability to provide rich data and content for multiplatform
environments.
• A detailed understanding of BBC Editorial Guidelines.
• An understanding of the issues surrounding talent management.
• A realistic understanding of the pressures, staffing and infrastructure
involved in producing weekday daily programmes over a long period.
• The ability to provide accurate financial information.
• An understanding of all relevant Health and Safety issues around the
programme.
• An understanding of relevant employment issues involved in the
production of a long-running daily weekday strand.
• Ideas on format and feature development.
• Evidence of having the mature editorial understanding needed to
balance particular audience expectations.