- Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:06 pm
#482185
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/f ... ments.html
Seems he's been given the sentence for his own safety, as locals want to destroy him. The charge was "sending by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive." if its a breakable law, and in the public interest (I believe that clamping down on saying this kind of behaviour is ok is important) then he should be charged.
No sympathy if he thinks that being a massive twat and posting sexual jokes about an abducted 5 year old on a public network is acceptable. Abuse is abuse is abuse. Frankie Boyle is a right twat also, but hasn't crossed the legal line recently.
Seems he's been given the sentence for his own safety, as locals want to destroy him. The charge was "sending by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive." if its a breakable law, and in the public interest (I believe that clamping down on saying this kind of behaviour is ok is important) then he should be charged.
No sympathy if he thinks that being a massive twat and posting sexual jokes about an abducted 5 year old on a public network is acceptable. Abuse is abuse is abuse. Frankie Boyle is a right twat also, but hasn't crossed the legal line recently.