The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
#482536
So moylesisagod is definitely chrisjames' new account.

Title of the thread is wrong as its not going to be a daily thing or even close to daily, and there's unnecessary punctuation but it's still well meaning enough to be a decent contribution. Classic CJ.
User avatar
By a-moron
#482543
wireman2004 wrote:i was actually wandering...


Aw c'mon. Yer ripping the pish now aren't you?

Wandering? * wandering! Away and take a long wander in the woods, no need to hurry back.
Or remember what path you took.
#482544
Yes, Chris banned him. He kept threatening to leave so Chris decided to make it easy for him. However it seems that he couldn't stay away even then.
#482550
Yes, but the IPs don't match. People can easily post from a different IP, home/college/work/mobile etc.
User avatar
By Yudster
#482561
Nic, can I borrow your snort? It seems very appropriate here!
#482564
You may indeed. Try to actually laugh with a snort as you type too, as I often do. It's attractive.

Oh also, interesting that there's been no "daily twitcast" today...
User avatar
By Yudster
#482565
*Snorts*!

Thanks Nic - here you go, I've washed it before I gave it back.
User avatar
By a-moron
#482594
Image


I personally think he's an antagonist, bull-shitter and a complete Bedford (although I quite liked DaveBedford) and if you allow him back into the fold I will never breathe the same air as you people ever again (or some other bullshit).

Dick.
#482595
If cruelty was allowed here we could do a poll to decide his new user name and give members the ability to edit all of his posts. Another idea would be to have a Chris James amnesty. We get all the hate out of our systems in one go, tell him how we really feel and then be nice to him until he * up.

Luckily it's not like that here...
User avatar
By a-moron
#482615
I couldn't really give a cat's * if he's allowed back or not.
Just enjoy the opportunity to have a wee outburst now and again.

Just tell what name he's going under if he's allowed back and I'll stick him back on the foes list.
#482631
ianpwilliams wrote:I've never really understood what the problem is with him. But then maybe I've not been around enough non-radio archive threads to be antagonized by it. But if it was my choice I would just leave him to it, as long as he obeyed the rules.


It's more that when he used to post, it got a very visceral reaction from some board members, as his posts used to be very obviously inflammatory in a subtle way.

I just stuck him on my foes list (like badger), only time it irritated me was the constant starting of new threads.

Sat and today are up

Changes at Radio One

Scott Mills is finally getting a Breakfast Show, a[…]