Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By MadTheEddos
#485579
Big oh no for me. Not dissimilar to Nic, I watched Corrie a lot in my early teens when Jack Duckworth was still a regular on it. I loved that character.
Oh no.
By voiceofreason
#486769
I am very shocked and saddened by his death.I only just finished watching Dallas on channel 5 for the past few weeks and thought he was looking good for his age.Rest on peace a true tv legend!
User avatar
By Yudster
#486793
Dallas was - first time around - epically brilliant TV. JR was a huge character, and Larry Hagman loved him and loved being him. It was so refreshing to see a mega-famous telly actor who loved the character, who loved the fame, the notoriety, the perks. Larry Hagman was unapologetically revelling in his fame and I liked that. I liked him. Oh no.
By HA94
#487023
Ah, there's the Chris James we know and love - always first to annouce the death of someone and post a link to a news story.
By HA94
#487026
dimtimjim wrote:Look, you got chastised for this before, why, why, why come back and do it again?!

I don't think he even realises what he does is wrong.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#487028
He's not the only one - what, exactly, is wrong with posting about a death in the thread that was set up specifically for that purpose? Fair enough it's a relatively obscure person, but there are no rules on the prominence of the stiff... I don't know why he's getting chastised this time. Apart, perhaps, from posting under another guise when his other account is moderator-approved posts only.
User avatar
By chrysostom
#487029
Defending CJ when he's being unfairly criticised is a dangerous game. Before you know it he'll post something ridiculous to undermine your efforts. I've been there.
User avatar
By The Deadly
#487030
To be fair to Chris James on this one I get the impression he is a huge fan of radio from things he has said on previous occasions.

That said I want to hit him with a very wet kipper.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#487031
chrysostom wrote:Defending CJ when he's being unfairly criticised is a dangerous game. Before you know it he'll post something ridiculous to undermine your efforts. I've been there.

Ha true, but my defence is limited to this one instance.
User avatar
By Yudster
#487038
I am mystified as to how posting about the death of a former R1 presenter in this particular thread could possibly offend anyone.

Having said that, Chris James is being a daft twunt pretending not to be himself.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#487044
Having given it some thought (work is quiet today), I think what irks people about CJ's posts in this thread is that he comes off like some sort of wannabe amateur reporter. He isn't posting about the deaths of these people cos he feels saddened or affected by them (or if he does, he's hiding it extremely well), and he doesn't really post personal memories or thoughts about the deceased people, he just rattles off facts and links as if he's pleased to be first to the punch in imparting the news. It's not against the rules in any way, it just seems a bit out of keeping with the thread.
By HA94
#487051
Nicola_Red wrote:Having given it some thought (work is quiet today), I think what irks people about CJ's posts in this thread is that he comes off like some sort of wannabe amateur reporter. He isn't posting about the deaths of these people cos he feels saddened or affected by them (or if he does, he's hiding it extremely well), and he doesn't really post personal memories or thoughts about the deceased people, he just rattles off facts and links as if he's pleased to be first to the punch in imparting the news. It's not against the rules in any way, it just seems a bit out of keeping with the thread.


Exactly.
User avatar
By The Deadly
#488169
Yeah it's a weird one this. Hopefully the tape will be released of the initial phone call that was made by the Australian radio station. She could have had a history of depression for all we know which is why I'm reserving judgement at the moment.
User avatar
By Yudster
#488170
Reserving judgement about what? I don't care how much of a history of depression she had, if this phone call pushed her over the edge, those two are responsible and I hope they now feel something of the same thing they put her through.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#488171
Reserving judgement about whether her death was connected to the phone call, I guess. It's entirely possible it wasn't, although admittedly it seems unlikely at this stage.
User avatar
By Yudster
#488172
Fair dos. But if it was them, they should be reminded of what they did every minute of every day for the rest of their lives. Maybe the royal family is fair game, but this was just someone trying to get on with their job - she wasn't a legitimate target for anything.
User avatar
By The Deadly
#488173
Yudster wrote:Reserving judgement about what? I don't care how much of a history of depression she had, if this phone call pushed her over the edge, those two are responsible and I hope they now feel something of the same thing they put her through.


Prank phone calls have been happening for decades and this to my knowledge hasn't happened before. The people who did the pranking had no idea that this would be the end result and until a full transcript is released of exactly what was said then I'm backing them up on this one. If it turns out the radio show said anything completely out of order or made threats then they shouldnt have to take the blame for her death. There was no intention on their part for this to happen. They did something that has been done on hundreds of occasions and unfortunately they may have stumbled across the someone who has either depression or another illness. It can't be considered normal behaviour for someone to kill themselves over a prank.
By bmstinton93
#488174
I completely agree with Deadly. I actually feel sorry for these 2 people doing the prank now that this is on their conscience.
  • 1
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 111

Sat and today are up