chrysostom wrote:JayE wrote:Drop it now.
Oh yeah, that's definitely me told. Sorry that I commented on a private situation which you brought into the public domain on the forum, of your own volition. Sorry about that, and I shall definitely be leaving the situation there.
LIES.
JayE wrote:Basically Deadly put on Twitter so and so hasn't tweeted an insult in over 14 hours or something
Having looked into the situation, this seems as though Deadly was referencing a person who is relevant to himself and a few other followers on Twitter with a niche interest who would find it funny. He was simply facilitating conversation from a certain section of his twitter followers with this action - looking into the user which Deadly was responding to, they're either unlpleasant or banterous - but clearly someone Deadly loves to hate.
JayE wrote:and I just wrote back "Neither have you surprisingly" I thought that was alright and that he'd find it funny, I suppose I was wrong.
You willingly entered a conversation which clearly wasn't aimed at getting a response from you, and then went on to use it as an opportunity to criticise the sender of the message out of the blue - with no context of having fun or 'back and forth ribbing'. Deadly then took exception to this, and blocked you. You then came on here to moan and either facilitate deadly unblocking you, or paint deadly as unreasonable. I say this as noone would have known about the situation unless you had come on here and said anything.
Deadly can block who he wants, and you should probably know him a little better that to randomly troll him. I'm guessing most members of the forum could see that happening in this situation - and if Deadly blocking you has had a significant impact on you, then you shouldn't have sent the tweet in the first place. You know he can be volatile, and need to learn from this situation. Temper your message to your audience.