- Mon May 19, 2014 1:21 pm
#503043
Ha! Well, a statement doesn't actually have to be untrue to be libel - all it has to do is damage someone's reputation or harm their business dealings. So, in theory, mentioning Chris' tax issues could still be potentially libellous. However, where there is evidence that the statement in question is true, "truth" is a pretty solid defence. So in this case, the court rulings that were made public are firm evidence that it is indeed true. On those grounds, a case would be unlikely to succeed.
Bas wrote:She's the Tina Daheley of chrismoyles.net
Missed any of Dave's Tedious Links? Catch up with my Tedious Links 2010-12 page here