Nicola_Red wrote:welshblob wrote:Nicola_Red wrote:
You're asking me how many 'a lot' is? Really? If you're asking me to go through the forum and count the number of posts that mention the issue, I'm not gonna do it. I'm happy to state for the record that this number does not include you, if that's what you want.
You stated "a lot" so how many is it? If you can't quantify it then don't state it, just put your opinion and say that you have seen others voice a similar concerns.
Just so everyone is clear on this its "a lot" - 1. I'm glad we're getting down to specifics
Do not tell me what I can and can't state please.
I'm entitled to my opinion thanks, just as you are entitled to yours.
Nicola_Red wrote:So if I say "I've seen others..." as you prefer - how many others?
I don't know and from what you stated above neither do you ..... see below
Nicola_Red wrote: What's the difference between "a lot" and "others", in your mind?
"a lot" is trying to imply there are a relatively high number of people who share the same opinion
"others" means there are other people who share the opinion but without trying imply that the number is high as you have no way of measuring it as you've said above.
Nicola_Red wrote: What is with everyone at the moment? I'm sick of needless snark. Chris or I will tell anyone if they have posted something that contravenes the rules, which is *extremely* rare. Otherwise we are all free to post what we like.
This is not about contravening rules, its about making a statement that infers there are a high number of people who share your opinion that, by your own admission, you have no way of quantifying.
Anyway that's the last I'm going to say on this other than I am not chrisjames.