I'M BACK AT WORK

The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
 Forum rules
 Reply
User avatar

By Gigglyboots
-  Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:57 am #213932
I actually read that this morning. We don't quite have delict this term, we do it later in more detail, so I may survive. We briefly did it in Criminal Law/Private Law. I do hope I can scrape passes in this exams...
User avatar

By Betti911
-  Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:26 pm #213935
Its a really good case to know back to front. We had to learn huge quotes from it for our 1st year exams.

Criminal law is a rotten exam. It seems easy at the time as its quite interesting but loads of people in my class failed. Its much easier in real life.

Am having a bad afternoon at work. A young boy (aged 5) peed in my office today. Kids these days.
User avatar

By Gigglyboots
-  Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:34 pm #213986
Yes.. I have 69 pages of typed lecture notes, and so many cases. It's fine enough knowing what the crimes are, but knowing authority for everything is a bit of a nightmare.

Crikes, I wouldn't have liked to clean that up.
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:39 pm #214010
Can somebody explain to me what the hell the Donoghue v Stevenson case is?
User avatar

By MK Chris
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:06 pm #214012
Looks like someone found a rotting snail in their ginger beer and took the manufacturer to court.
User avatar

By Gigglyboots
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:31 pm #214016
Yes, I think they claimed it caused them shock and gastric problems. I think previously, the manufacturer couldn't be held liable, but in this case they were. It's really not something I had to go into.

I get the joys of statutory interpretation and the Scottish Legal System today. I have 25 cases written on the fridge so everytime I want food/chilled alcohol I have to read them
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:00 pm #214035
So who won? I'm intrigued.
User avatar

By MK Chris
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:35 pm #214038
Gigglyboots wrote:YI think previously, the manufacturer couldn't be held liable, but in this case they were.

Read the information Sidders.
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:40 pm #214042
Ah, sorry. Not up to scratch on all this legal jargon.
User avatar

By MK Chris
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:44 pm #214043
What liable?? Are you kidding?
User avatar

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 3:18 pm #214053
Its one of the most significant cases in Business Law. Basically its the starting point.
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:01 pm #214077
What year was that?
User avatar

By MK Chris
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:04 pm #214080
Look up on it yourself you lazy bastard.
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:30 pm #214082
Can't be arsed with that.
User avatar

By Gigglyboots
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:47 pm #214083
Westlaw Sidla, Westlaw..

It's got most of the UK cases on it.
User avatar

By Sidders
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:51 pm #214086
Nah, you have to sign up. Sod that.
User avatar

By Gigglyboots
-  Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:52 pm #214088
Ah, forgot, we are registered with the uni and all.
 Reply
 Return to “General”
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

READ MORE
Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

READ MORE
Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

READ MORE
Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]

READ MORE