[Everlast]

I don't do polotics but while i'm here i think they should get rid of Sadaam and Robert Mugabe, the pair of C*nts. And as for that prick Abu Hamzaa we should just have him deported to his beloved Afghanistan and see how he likes it there. I'm i the only one who thinks this guy is a hypocrite slagging of England while using the freedom of speech he would never be able to use in his own country

[MK Chris]

Done. Honestly, the lengths I have to go to. *dramatic sigh*

At least I've made an impression (until the next time you have to change it 'cos someone thinks you're a wolf or something.)

[Sam]

I refuse to change it to that, no-one can be that stupid.

[Nablo.]

8O Your not a wolf then?

[MK Chris]

I refuse to change it to that, no-one can be that stupid.

You obviously haven't been to MK.

On a wolf note, I must advise everyone to get Dog Soldiers, it is a * marvellous film.

Great British black humour, and you really don't care if its a tiny bit far fetched at times (sometimes you have to wonder exactly how fast a man would have to run into a tree branch to impale himself onto it...)

[Eddie]

You keep saying good things about that film, it's ok, not great though. Worth watching yes but buying...maybe not. Just MY opinion though!

[Nablo.]

I was on about that film from it's release but no one pays attention to me. Sean Pertwee doing a great job, you can't but laugh when his inners fall out. Plus if I was that bloke at the end and I had no weapons I think I'd start smacking it in the face to.

[MK Chris]

Out today, bought it and just watched it again. Sorry to go on about it.

[Everlast]

Sean Peartwee is a good actor

[superwoman]

You can't have 'a war against terroism', because fighting terror with terror doesn't work.

isnt a war against terrorism a double negative type thingy, its just bush wanting to finish off daddys jobs, all the american people will fight because of sept 11. i think its wrong, bush must be stopped before he takes over the world, america wants to rule the world and thats where its going!!!!!!

the small number of countries who didnt want the war are slowly being broken down, they are thought of as wrong because they are saying no, their people do not want war, not amny civilians do, its the power crazy goverments who got us into this mess, if it wasnt for them then the war wouldnt be happening.

another thing is, who's weapons are being used. i think you'll find they belonged to us at one time!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Hypeymikey!]

I don't think we should go to war!
And i'm so happy that Sam is a gr8 friend who will stick up for the right cause. But if we topple saddam then iraqi people will b free. I've got nothing against the iraqi people and i don't think they should b blamed for something that there leader is causing.
But the thing i don't understand is that all the big powerful countries have weapons of mass destruction but they don't disarm but whenever it comes to small countries trying to develop mass destructions the politictions of the big countries are first to wage war.
But i think bush is intent on revenge and they are taking it out on the Iraqi. But they say there fighting terrorism so why don't they attack Saudi Arabia and pakistan because they are the countries that are providing for the terrorists.
Thats my say on the issue

[Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog]

I would like to state for the board i have never owned a scud missile.

[superwoman]

hmm, i would also like to state that it want me caught on camera purchasing an air riffle gun yesterday....

[timb]

because a war against pakistan or saudi arabia wouldn't be that easy to win. no point in starting a war you don't know you're going to win. no point in avoiding war against a country you could easily beat just because there are others you can't.

[StaticFish]

I don't think we should go to war!
And i'm so happy that Sam is a gr8 friend who will stick up for the right cause. But if we topple saddam then iraqi people will b free. I've got nothing against the iraqi people and i don't think they should b blamed for something that there leader is causing.
But the thing i don't understand is that all the big powerful countries have weapons of mass destruction but they don't disarm but whenever it comes to small countries trying to develop mass destructions the politictions of the big countries are first to wage war.
But i think bush is intent on revenge and they are taking it out on the Iraqi. But they say there fighting terrorism so why don't they attack Saudi Arabia and pakistan because they are the countries that are providing for the terrorists.
Thats my say on the issue

wow! you said something usefull

[gregs]

to the tune of 'if your happy and you know it'

If we cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq. If the markets hurt your Mama, bomb Iraq. If the terrorists are Saudi And the bank takes back your Audi And the TV shows are bawdy, Bomb Iraq.

If the corporate scandals growin', bomb Iraq. And your ties to them are showin', bomb Iraq. If the smoking gun ain't smokin' We don't care, and we're not jokin'. That Saddam will soon be croakin', Bomb Iraq.

Even if we have no allies, bomb Iraq. From the sand dunes to the valleys, bomb Iraq. So to hell with the inspections; Let's look tough for the elections, Close your mind and take directions, Bomb Iraq.

While the globe is slowly warming, bomb Iraq. Yay! the clouds of war are storming, bomb Iraq. If the ozone hole is growing, Some things we prefer not knowing. (Though our ignorance is showing), Bomb Iraq.

So here's one for dear old daddy, bomb Iraq, From his favorite little laddy, bomb Iraq. Saying no would look like treason. It's the Hussein hunting season. Even if we have no reason, Bomb Iraq.




seriously: britain can't justify war, no-one really wants war, so why have war?


gregs

[MK Chris]

Now, I would be going on about the threats of war, but until around 9:30 there is something much more important going on, see here...

[timb]

iraq is ruled by an evil dictator who murders his own people.

whoops did i just justify a war on iraq?

hell yeah

[KFA]

I am still undecided about a war. On the one hand the we don't need another group of people determined on launching a terrorist attack on the UK and causing even more panic. We also have our own domestic problems to solve: the NHS, education, economy. A war would take money much needed money away from these sectors Blair less time to spend on them. I hate the fact that Bush seems to want a war at all costs and doesn't seem to care about the little matter of proof.

On the other hand, If we don't do something, who knows what Saddam will do next? He may have a huge supply of chemical and biological weapons and if he and Bin Laden were to work together there could be a huge terrorist attack somewhere in the Western world. A majority of the people originally from Iraq living here are in favour of an attack, as they know the true evils of Saddam and feel the lives lost in a war would be less than those at the hands of the dictator. Some of the speeches I have seen from the protests were unbelievable. They were more interested in bad-mouthing Bush than giving his reasons for disarming saddam peacefully.

Anyway, that's how I feel, not conviced either way so far.