- Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:13 pm
#150218
Well, my point WOULD have been, you make a judement when you take that pee at how comfy you are doing it in public. I'm speaking for myself here, but if I had decided to take that pee "in public" doesn't mean I'm comfortable enough for everyone who makes up the public to watch me. If I was in front of a 60,000 seater stadium I probably would have decided it better not to pee in public. My point being - just cause it was a public chat doesn't mean everyone's entitled to see it. You would have made a judgement of who was there before revealing who I/them/anyone was. Please honour that and don't hunt the transcript down
t36 wrote:Sidla wrote:Isn't that exactly what I just said?
Yep, but a very slightly different angle. What I'm edging at is the fact that when you have a p*ss, you don't expect people to be watching you. When you come on to a messageboard declaring that you are Chris Moyles, you expect an audience. And why the whole event should be kept an amazing secret defies logic to me. At the end of the day, if someone were kind enough to forward the transcript, I'd read it, then what would I do? Well, nothing! So what's the whole issue?! I don't understand that one at all. I've already explained my personal reasoning, and I can't work out why anyone would WANT to make it publically viewable anyway!
Well, my point WOULD have been, you make a judement when you take that pee at how comfy you are doing it in public. I'm speaking for myself here, but if I had decided to take that pee "in public" doesn't mean I'm comfortable enough for everyone who makes up the public to watch me. If I was in front of a 60,000 seater stadium I probably would have decided it better not to pee in public. My point being - just cause it was a public chat doesn't mean everyone's entitled to see it. You would have made a judgement of who was there before revealing who I/them/anyone was. Please honour that and don't hunt the transcript down
