First Reviewers - chrismoyles.net forum

First Reviewers#187657

By parody number 9 - Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:11 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:11 pm #187657

Being as though this site has had a number of new reviewers recently I was wondering who did the first?

#187661

By fish heads - Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:13 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:13 pm #187661

"Tom" according to this.

Wasn't that hard to find

Silly Catface

#187667

By Sidders - Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:16 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:16 pm #187667

I was the best though.

Ahem.

#187671

By Adam - Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:19 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:19 pm #187671

I miss Sidlas reviews.

It was great.

#187675

By Sidders - Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:23 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:23 pm #187675

You're the only one who does.

#187699

By Console - Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:46 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:46 pm #187699

Why did you stop reviewing Sidla?

#187711

By Quincy - Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:57 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:57 pm #187711

It was great.

im guessing thats a clue

#187715

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog - Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm #187715

Uglybob's were the first proper regular ones though because some of the ones before were terrible.

Here's to those who bore us and made us what we are

#187718

By Quincy - Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:03 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:03 pm #187718

ha you should read my scott mills reviews then! utter drivel, but what else would you expect from myself.

#187723

By MC - Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:15 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:15 pm #187723

Uglybob's were the first proper regular ones though because some of the ones before were terrible.

Cue example:

http://chrismoyles.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtop ... 598#157598

#187724

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog - Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:17 pm

- Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:17 pm #187724

Euan Denholm I seem to remember as being shockingly bad. It was a crime he even got in the Poll for best reviewer.

Here's to those who bore us and made us what we are

#187770

By Jelly Babe - Sat Aug 06, 2005 2:35 pm

- Sat Aug 06, 2005 2:35 pm #187770

Well done to whoever does the reviews as they are very useful for finding out song names and its easy to catch up if you miss any shows

#187801

By Sidders - Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:36 pm

- Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:36 pm #187801

Why did you stop reviewing Sidla?

Cos I couldn't be arsed doing them when I had uni work that I should have been doing. Although I still didn't do any uni work even when I'd finished reviewing.

And I was crap.

#187803

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog - Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:50 pm

- Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:50 pm #187803

yeah emphasis on the last bit.

Here's to those who bore us and made us what we are

#188124

By Fathomer - Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:16 am

- Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:16 am #188124

it was harder reviewing the afternoon bit wasn't it cause you didn't have "Listen Again"

#188135

By Mcqueen_ - Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:34 am

- Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:34 am #188135

Yeah and recording equipment was just a twinkle in a geeks eye.

#188196

By Uglybob - Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:57 pm

- Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:57 pm #188196

yeah what i did was tape the show on a 90 minute tape and cut out all the music. then i listened over to it and wrote the review whilst listening. also the transcripts of interviews were done by rewinding and fast forwarding the tape machine lots and lots of times.

dave benson phillips