- Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:15 am
#306394
Bonus point. Whatever next. Better performance too, but still with gaping great holes in it. Still, no-one had any illusions England were going to perform well in this tournament, so why people seem so shocked about it is beyond me. And Scotland Wales and Ireland have all been just as bad, if not worse. But overall it hasn't been as good as the last world cup at all, only South Africa have a better team now than they did then. Still think its Australias to take though. New Zealand should have put a lot more than 40 points on that Scottish reserves team. Come on Italy!
I'd been wondering why Wales and Scotland had been playing their games at Cardiff and Murrayfield in the World Cup which supposedly takes place in France - apparently (I was told, don't know if its right) the French authorities (whoever they are) did a deal with Scotland and Wales before the venue was voted for, and said that if they voted for France, they could have their games at home. I suppose it was a fair bet, knowing that even home advantage wouldn't actually make a difference to the performance of either of those two teams.
I was talking to some South African rugby fans on Saturday - I saw Percy Montgomery play for the Barbarians against England a few years ago and he was brilliant - I said so, and the South Africans told me that he is hated by rugby fans over there, even though he is probably their most valuable player. When I asked why, they said its because he is gay. Didn't quite know what to make of that!
Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.