Animals You Reckon You Could Batter - Page 2

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#341892

By Sunny So Cal - Thu May 15, 2008 3:40 am

- Thu May 15, 2008 3:40 am #341892

C'mon. Join in. If only for the halibut.

You are our most famous person member, you're like our celeb!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#341901

By pjordan2000 - Thu May 15, 2008 8:10 am

- Thu May 15, 2008 8:10 am #341901

...for cods hake dud!

Come on then, how bad was it...? On a scale of 1 - 10?

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#341917

By Yudster - Thu May 15, 2008 9:16 am

- Thu May 15, 2008 9:16 am #341917

Badgers can be vicious, they're very territorial.

Badgers are heavy, immensely strong (they'll have a brick wall down in no time if the want to get past it), have massive great * claws which they really know how to use and big, sharp, rippy, carnivores teeth. The only difference between a badger and a smallish wild cat (say a puma) in a fight is that the cat is more likely to run away.

Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.

Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342016

By foot-loose - Thu May 15, 2008 4:46 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 4:46 pm #342016

C'mon. Join in. If only for the halibut.

What? Is 'halibut' meant to be 'hell of it'? If so, you need to work on your punnages!

...for cods hake dud!

Come on then, how bad was it...? On a scale of 1 - 10?

Fintastically bad. I'm begginning to get a bit crabby with it all actually. Everyone - stop carping on!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342017

By foot-loose - Thu May 15, 2008 4:47 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 4:47 pm #342017

Badgers can be vicious, they're very territorial.

Badgers are heavy, immensely strong (they'll have a brick wall down in no time if the want to get past it), have massive great * claws which they really know how to use and big, sharp, rippy, carnivores teeth. The only difference between a badger and a smallish wild cat (say a puma) in a fight is that the cat is more likely to run away.

You make a badger sound like the Thundertank!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342018

By DevilsDuck - Thu May 15, 2008 4:53 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 4:53 pm #342018

Fintastically bad. I'm begginning to get a bit crabby with it all actually. Everyone - stop carping on!

I couldnt give a flying fish, and you need to stop stealing other peoples puns!

Send me the answer to question 1!

P. S. Don't argue with Topher or Zoot

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342019

By foot-loose - Thu May 15, 2008 4:54 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 4:54 pm #342019

Sorry - i sea it now. It was carp in the first place anyways.

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342024

By DevilsDuck - Thu May 15, 2008 5:27 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 5:27 pm #342024

was it pollocks!

Send me the answer to question 1!

P. S. Don't argue with Topher or Zoot

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342028

By Andy B - Thu May 15, 2008 6:02 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 6:02 pm #342028

I once took on the Thundertank and Optimus prime. I found their weaknesses and exploited them....neither of them can withstand being thrown against a bedroom wall. Easy tip there should you happen to find yourself going toe to toe with the leader of the Autobots. Megatrons legs fell off so I didn't bother with him.

Andy B: Very lazy, flirtatious person with wonderful hair who does not resemble prince charming. Very sarcastic so if something he posts seems stupid it's probably deliberate. Aspirations of global dictatorship so you'll probably first against the wall come the revolution.

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342051

By Sunny So Cal - Thu May 15, 2008 9:18 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 9:18 pm #342051

C'mon. Join in. If only for the halibut.

What? Is 'halibut' meant to be 'hell of it'? If so, you need to work on your punnages!

A halibut is a fish! Like "carp" is any better :roll:

You are our most famous person member, you're like our celeb!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342053

By foot-loose - Thu May 15, 2008 9:59 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 9:59 pm #342053

C'mon. Join in. If only for the halibut.

What? Is 'halibut' meant to be 'hell of it'? If so, you need to work on your punnages!

A halibut is a fish! Like "carp" is any better

I know it is ya muppet. Carp works since its a mere spelling mistake away from 'crap'.

And for yer post to have worked in a pun-off - you should have said "like "carp" is any batter".

Do you catch my drift?

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342068

By Sunny So Cal - Thu May 15, 2008 11:33 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 11:33 pm #342068

Pah. I'm saury my last post hadn't contributed to the pun-off but the halibut one did. Have a little sole. There's no need to be so crappie about it.

You are our most famous person member, you're like our celeb!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342069

By foot-loose - Thu May 15, 2008 11:45 pm

- Thu May 15, 2008 11:45 pm #342069

Sorry. I don't want to have a roe about it. If you need any kelp with some more, give me a shout.

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342070

By Sunny So Cal - Fri May 16, 2008 12:37 am

- Fri May 16, 2008 12:37 am #342070

Wait a minute, do you think I'm some old wife that will flounder on her own? A damsel that needs help from some wahoo? In your breams! Off with you, you crowned puffer! :wink:

You are our most famous person member, you're like our celeb!

Re: Animals You Reckon You Could Batter#342095

By Yudster - Fri May 16, 2008 9:04 am

- Fri May 16, 2008 9:04 am #342095

You make a badger sound like the Thundertank!

When I do talks about protected species legislation and the problems people can experience dealing with it I actually do compare a badger with tank, also a bulldozer. On a weight to weight ratio badgers are a hell of a lot more destructive.