Stuff about Thatcher....
You are a disgrace and I'm looking forward to when someone you respect dies so I can rub your liberal face in it.
High on a hill ?
...was a lonely goatherd,
lay odl lay odl lay hee hoo etc.
but Chris should grow some balls and support Russell and Jonathan.
Mr Tait said the offence of the original broadcast was compounded by Russell Brand's appearance on Chris Moyles's Radio 1 show on 21 October, when the pair talked about the incident.
He said this discussion, in itself, was also in breach of editorial guidelines in respect of privacy, offence and the fact it was broadcast at a time when children were likely to be listening.
I dont remember them ever talking about the incident on Chris' show
I dont remember them ever talking about the incident on Chris' show
Well they did mention it, the audio of it is in the sound vault, but as always hindsight is a great thing. I presume the interview was done before the Daily Mail decided to cry foul
http://chrismoyles.net/soundvault/pafil ... le&id=1816
The Manuel references start at 09:28 but theres no way for Chris to know what a guest is going to blurt out.
however Moyles can't control his guests 100% of the time (look at Louis Walsh this morning when he referred to Drum & Bass as sh*t, that weren't Chris' fault or provoked by him at all.Can't understand why Chris invited him on the show.
Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
Chris had no control over what the court jester was going to blurt out. He obviously has an inability to refrain from talking about a legal minefield subject. Probably all those days as a eloquent smackhead in Ye Olde London. Can't understand why Chris invited him on the show.
Stuff about Thatcher....
You are a disgrace and I'm looking forward to when someone you respect dies so I can rub your liberal face in it.
For hangovers, fry up >>>>>>>>>> Big Mac. In fact, that's true without a hangover too.
As for the Daily Mail, I think it's what's termed a 'middle market' paper - it's a tabloid, but it goes for those who consider themselves (wrongly in my opinion) to be above the red tops. It's the second or third highest selling paper in the country and as The S*n is the highest selling, that tells you a lot about the newspaper-buying public - and also tells you why they both have a lot of influence, unfortunately. They go in for sensationalism just as much as The S*n does.
chrismoyles.net
