[bradcali]

I thought it was but turns out it's not.Sorry

[Bonanzoid]

Once again, nothing to back this up, leading me to believe it's pish from bradcali.

However, if you're right I'm fairly gutted - Vic Galloway is braw.

[freddie]

It is pish.

http://www.unofficialmills.co.uk/commun ... 1249924941

If you look at Wednesday night on the schedule (00:00 - 02:00), it says Huw Stephens & THE NATIONS

[bradcali]

well I was looking at the DIgiguide listings ,which were updated yesterday,which simply says Huw Stephens,when it normally is BBC Introducing..iF Im wrong I apologise.Of course it could be just an error on Digiguides part.

update-Vic Galloways page shows sessions planned for the show through to october 15 so it looks like I got it wrong and the nations will continue after all http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/vicgalloway/

[English Bob]

I love how brad blows things massively out of proportion. Because one thing was lacking from the schedule, he comes to the conclusion that the DJs must have been axed? Haha!

My milkman didn't deliver my milk yesterday! HE MUST HAVE BEEN SACKED! OH MY GOD ALL THE DAIRIES ARE OUT OF BUSINESS!

NO MORE MILK FOR ANYONE!!!!!!!!




Oh wait, he just forgot to deliver to my house.

Sorry.

[John22]

I'm glad it's staying, I think that it's a good idea to give east country it's own new music.

[dannimaria]

Bradcali should write headlines for the Daily Hate.

[wireman2004]

this guy bradcali is worse than me. God. The nations are going. No wait They're staying. Who gives a flying f*<k. If i wanted too listen too the effin nations. I'd bloody listen too the effin nations.

Ladies and gentlemen. Bradcali's next exclusive. This will 3 weeks old by the time he gives this exclusive scoop just for us on chris moyles.net.
TERRY WOGAN IS RETIREING.

Guess what bradcali. I don't give a flying * about your exclusives that are already 4 weeks old that i've already heard about in the papers or on the entertainment section on bbc cefax page 501.

Bradcali. I've got a few exclusives for you.
> chris moyles beat tony blackburn on monday too be the longest serving breakfast d.j
> chris had scott mills round for tea last thursday and talked about cheese boards.
> chris is in glasgow tonight doing his night with chris moyles kareoke
> carrie is ill.
> chris is a d.j on radio 1

> my last exclusive for you.
Nobody on here gives a flying * about your exclusives. Your observations or your * opinion about anything you say here.


Rant over

[MK Chris]

Bradcali doesn't dredge up old news, he makes it up.

Oh, Terry Wogan isn't retiring, he's just stepping down from the breakfast show on Radio 2.

[Yudster]

Nobody on here gives a flying * about............ Your observations or your * opinion about anything you say here.

Apply this to yourself. It has equal validity.

[Lactating Man Nips]

Ladies and gentlemen. Bradcali's next exclusive. blah..

Another example of gallery-playing twattery. Pile-on lads eh?

Nobody on here gives a flying * about your exclusives. Your observations or your * opinion about anything you say here.

Well, if you don't really care about something then don't express an opinion about it - exercising your 'entitlement' to do so just makes you look a bit miserable.

Bradcali's 'news flashes' are indeed more like hypotheses but nonetheless thought-provoking and always on topic. Why the mad rush to prove him wrong?

[MK Chris]

Because he presents them as facts.

[Lactating Man Nips]

Because he presents them as facts.

Yeah..it's about the facts.

[Yudster]

Because he presents them as facts.

Yeah..it's about the facts.

Well why not? Bradcali has an infuriating and overwhelmingly frequent need to make speculative and often inflammatory comments and present them as something considerably more than just the product of his febrile imagination. He also likes to imply that he has access to information which could be considered as "inside", but never actually has any basis for that supposition either. When the things he presents as fact either don't happen or are shown by subsequent (real) events to be false, he simply moves on to the next piece of imaginary scandal-mongering he can conjour up. Its not surprising that people get irritated by the constant parading of his self-important fabricated nonsense.

Just because wireman is a twat too doesn't mean he is entirely wrong about bradcali.

[Lactating Man Nips]

So you're describing a relentless troll who despite persistent prodding for evidence unsurprisingly can't supply any. Why people get wound up by trolls is beyond me. Whether his insights are fact or not are of bugger all consequence (cf his last thread) and yet a braying mob salivate at the delight of 'proving' him wrong with some nasty ad hominems to boot - go you.

Wireman's earlier views as self-appointed spokeswoman were just hilariously late and 'me-too' like the thug that rushes back to the floored victim to stick a last badly aimed kick to the head in order to claim his high-fives.

[wireman2004]

that is not the point that i made.
The point is that at times i can struggle too express the views of mine when starting threads and i get be-rated for it is minor compared too the what. 15 or so threads that bradcali has opened giving his 'exclusives' with no evidence. Or any justification for starting the thread.

And too then move on too the next 'exclusive' seemingly forgetting the previous post and what inaccurate information was said before.

His exclusives then dropping them without any notice is very gordon smart.

One of these days. One of bradcali's 'exclusives' could end with chris in very hot water.

[Lactating Man Nips]

that is not the point that i made.
The point is that at times i can struggle too express the views of mine when starting threads and i get be-rated for it is minor compared too the what. 15 or so threads that bradcali has opened giving his 'exclusives' with no evidence. Or any justification for starting the thread.

Maybe he's just an over zealous fan of Chris who probably misreads some articles or second-guesses upcoming rumours and is eager to be the first to discuss them. Quite an endearing quality but you seemed to have imagined into existence some sort of authority into these with little sense of empathy.

Threads? I'm sure that the site owner would be quite pleased that people are eager to start new threads for mini discussions, that's what a forum is for.

And too then move on too the next 'exclusive' seemingly forgetting the previous post and what inaccurate information was said before.

I've seen a few gracious back-pedals but otherwise what's wrong with just moving on although I do admire your Wikipedic need for citations.

One of these days. One of bradcali's 'exclusives' could end with chris in very hot water.

Pfft..

[Yudster]

Pfft..

What he said.