The shows - Page 3 - chrismoyles.net forum

#58945

By Chris - Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:28 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 4:28 pm #58945

do people who get bad reviews for their plays and films go and complain to the reviewer asking why they got such a sh-ite review?

No, of course not - because they can't change them. A radio show is dynamic, not a performance and as such will appeal do different people in different ways at different times.

Last edited by Chris on Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.

#58955

By Aled - Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:34 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:34 pm #58955

do people who get bad reviews for their plays and films go and complain to the reviewer asking why they got such a sh-ite review? learn by your mistakes. asking bbc chat last night, they said moyles show had been rubbish for 1 and half years...

time for some new stuff. but im happy with what moyles is doing. just listening to the chat and banter.

I wasn't complaining that the show got a bad review. I was complaining that after Monday's show a lot of effort went into Tuesday's and yet in the review it was tarnished with the same "lazy show" brush that monday's was. I didn't think it was fair.

I can't comment about the show's current greatness. As far as I'm concerned the old days of EastEnders are always the best ones.

#58958

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:43 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:43 pm #58958

Another link filled with Footballer's Wives crap today...

I tried to be fair in the review, but it really does bore me.

#58971

By Uglybob - Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:26 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:26 pm #58971

It used to be a diary sorta style when i did it on my own, now its more a sorta rundown on what happened.

dave benson phillips

#58997

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:13 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:13 pm #58997

Hang on, who's Greg and why wasn't I informed that he would be doing the review?

#59000

By Uglybob - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:22 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:22 pm #59000

i dunno, i got a review today from u, greg, david and sam for some bizarre reason. his was the least negative and he covered it to 4:30.

dave benson phillips

#59002

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:23 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:23 pm #59002

Weird. David as in David Lewis?

#59003

By Sam - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:25 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:25 pm #59003

Greg PM'd me and said he'd done a review cos he was bored, so I told him to send it on to you bob. Dunno about David. Do you think people reckon we aren't up to our jobs?

99% of the people in this world are fools. The rest are in great danger of contagion

#59006

By Chris - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:26 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:26 pm #59006

If you get multiple reviews, I'd post them all. It would be interesting to see if opinion differed - and it saves peoples work going to waste.

@c_hri_s
@chrismoylesnet

#59007

By Uglybob - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:28 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:28 pm #59007

id prefer just one review, as it means you get more days on the page. plus greg should have told sidla in the first place.

dave benson phillips

#59009

By kendra k - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:31 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:31 pm #59009

i would agree with chris. i read the reviews regularly, and would like some variety in the style from time to time. not that our current review team isn't doing a good job, but they do seem stale/formulaic/and predjudiced at times.

kendra i love you so much

Oh shut up you titless American biatch

kendrak's attack

#59011

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:32 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:32 pm #59011

Yeah, please let me know if you're going to do the review. It doesn't bother me because I've got 101 things to do that are more important. Sam did it last Thursday and she didn't tell me she was going to do it, so I spend 1 hour doing the review when it's a complete waste of time.

#59012

By Uglybob - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:33 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:33 pm #59012

that was partly your fault though cos you told her you couldnt do thursdays

dave benson phillips

#59018

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:35 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:35 pm #59018

Well, true, I suppose I should have let her know, but I assumed she wouldn't be doing it. In hindsight though, it was half-term so I might have guessed that she would do it.

#59027

By gregs - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:39 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:39 pm #59027

apologies to sidla... don't know why i didnt e-mail you, sorry!

i'll try and do the review wen i can just in case anyone misses/cant do it... if you dont use it i dont care - beats doing homework!

apologies again...

gregs

(by the way, sam - its not that i think the reviews are bad... they are great, especially when you miss a show.... sorry if i've offended anyone!)

Last edited by gregs on Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ey up fella!
there's something curious about this broadcast!

#59031

By Sam - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:41 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:41 pm #59031

Bad communication both ways. I knew you normally can't do Thurs and so I did it without thinking about telling you. Only afterwards I remembered that you had a reading week or whatever it's called. Can you do it tomorrow or shall I start when I get in?

99% of the people in this world are fools. The rest are in great danger of contagion

#59051

By Sidders - Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:58 pm

- Wed Feb 26, 2003 7:58 pm #59051

I do have my lecture cancelled, but I've agreed to go to a group project meeting at 3 oclock, so no I can't do it. In fact, I'll miss the whole show tomorrow, so make it a good review.