- Sat Mar 15, 2003 8:49 pm
#64709
i have to say that this is nuts. my problems with this are threefold:
1. slightly-bigger-than-they-should-be avatars have been around for ages, why is this being addressed now?
2. notice how my name was first on chris' list? is this because someone had an issue with my avatar recently? i think so. point your blame now.
3. we are set to lose/change some great avatars here. such as gaspodes, i mean, what a legendary av. (and i really really like my av too)
how about if you think someones avatar is an issue then have a poll on it to see if other users have a problem with. that would be more sensible and diplomatic in my opinion.
please rethink this
1. slightly-bigger-than-they-should-be avatars have been around for ages, why is this being addressed now?
2. notice how my name was first on chris' list? is this because someone had an issue with my avatar recently? i think so. point your blame now.
3. we are set to lose/change some great avatars here. such as gaspodes, i mean, what a legendary av. (and i really really like my av too)
how about if you think someones avatar is an issue then have a poll on it to see if other users have a problem with. that would be more sensible and diplomatic in my opinion.
please rethink this