pointless beautiful ladies thread - Page 4

#192208

By matt_32510 - Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:57 am

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:57 am #192208

The best was Debbie (but she left), Steph is quite fit. (i havent watched hollyoaks for ages so I dont know most of the people now).

#192210

By Quincy - Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:07 am

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:07 am #192210

actually chloe was the best. hmmm

#192300

By Sidders - Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:32 pm

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:32 pm #192300

Natalie Imbruglia looks like a man in that photo.

#192342

By Uglybob - Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:00 pm

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:00 pm #192342

and is the amazing one boobed woman

dave benson phillips

#192352

By Mafro - Mon Sep 05, 2005 7:13 pm

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 7:13 pm #192352

Emma Griffiths = good mornin'

Becca isn't that hot, she's got a huge, nose, big ears and tiny teeth. Lisa and Louise are joint hottest in my opinion. Natalie was stuning, pity she left, she's in this months Maxim.

#192386

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog - Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:55 pm

- Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:55 pm #192386

Natalie was the one with the plastic face that seemed to have no expression was she?

Here's to those who bore us and made us what we are

#192639

By Mafro - Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:28 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:28 pm #192639

Yup. I saw some photos from the Hollyoaks girls calendar shoot the other day, looks like the ugly twins are going to be in it!

#192663

By Quincy - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:48 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:48 pm #192663

i think them twins are ok.

#192665

By Sidders - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:49 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:49 pm #192665

Well if Mafro thinks they're ugly they probably are OK.

#192674

By Lucie - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:54 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:54 pm #192674

Gosh you lot are hard to please! The Hollyoaks twins aren't ugly!

#192682

By Quincy - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:57 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:57 pm #192682

hmm but theyre bot quite up to the usual hollyoaks standard

#192684

By Lucie - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:59 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:59 pm #192684

hmm but theyre bot quite up to the usual hollyoaks standard

hahahahaha we're back to good ol' freud again.

#192685

By Sidders - Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:59 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:59 pm #192685

Dear God.

#192690

By Wyatt - Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:02 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:02 pm #192690

Dear God.

Dont you mean "forgive me father, for I have sinned"

#192711

By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog - Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:22 pm

- Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:22 pm #192711

if sidla is Jesus then im giving up now.

Here's to those who bore us and made us what we are

#192758

By Betti911 - Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:45 am

- Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:45 am #192758

Where you going to go to?

Betti - Better than Viagra.

#192766

By Dickie - Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:50 am

- Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:50 am #192766

Gosh you lot are hard to please! The Hollyoaks twins aren't ugly!

The alcoholic one is uglier. I know they're virtually identical but she just is!

#192791

By Quincy - Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:10 pm

- Wed Sep 07, 2005 1:10 pm #192791

her skin is a bit oily and she is a bit spottier

#192820

By Mafro - Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:13 pm

- Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:13 pm #192820

They've got hooked noses, jaggy teeth, moles on their faces and huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge chins.

#193410

By DemonHorse - Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:58 pm

- Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:58 pm #193410

actually chloe was the best. hmmm

for me, Louise and Danni from hollyoaks look almost the same, but at least that pair are far better than the dumb@ss twins. They are up there with Debbie (Jodi Albert) and now above Lisa for me.... Nicole is also nice.

Anyone who thinks we're contributing to the dumbing-down of internet forums can shove their stupid opinion up their a$$